Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Tainter Lake CDP shows it has a housing units of 1,343 which is the second most housing units of all the places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Tainter Lake CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Tainter Lake CDP shows it has a housing density of 72.5 which is the smallest when ranked by housing density of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Menomonie which shows a density of 459.0 ( very much bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Tainter Lake CDP is about twice as large. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.6, Tainter Lake CDP is 46.1% larger.

In Figure 4, Tainter Lake CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Tainter Lake CDP shows it has a change in the housing units of 10.0% which is the third most housing units of all other places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Elk Mound which shows a housing units of 15.6% (56.6% larger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Tainter Lake CDP is about twice as large. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.2%, Tainter Lake CDP is approximately 4.6 times bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Tainter Lake CDP depicts it has a renter percent of 17.7% which is the smallest in order of renter percent of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 82.3% which is more than all other places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region.

Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Tainter Lake CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Tainter Lake CDP depicts it has a median home price of $194,000 which is the largest of all places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Tainter Lake CDP depicts it has a rental rates of $1,148 which is the largest of all places in the local area. Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Tainter Lake CDP is 12.2% larger. Also, versus the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $837, Tainter Lake CDP is 37.2% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Tainter Lake CDP has the smallest proportion of home price worth less than $50,000 at 7% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 2% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 31% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $300,000 to $400,000 at 11% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $500,000 to $750,000 at 2% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Tainter Lake CDP shows it has a median ownership cost of $1,132 which is is the uppermost of the places in the greater region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Tainter Lake CDP metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 17% which is the smallest when ranked by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Tainter Lake CDP shows it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 376% which is the highest of all places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Tainter Lake CDP depicts it has a median housing cost of $1,454 which is the highest of all places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $596 which is the largest of all places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Tainter Lake CDP has the percentage of owner cost less than $300 the second smallest when sorted by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area in terms of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 7% of the total. Third, it has the second smallest when ranked by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area when sorted by owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 16% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 18% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 9% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1. Next it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $3,500 and $4,000 at 0% of the total and is ranked #1. Additionally, it has the largest proportion of owner cost over $4,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Tainter Lake CDP shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 19% which is the second smallest as measured by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Wheeler which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 23% (21.8% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Tainter Lake CDP depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 12% which is the smallest in terms of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Boyceville which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 16% (41.4% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Tainter Lake CDP has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 32% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Elk Mound with 57%. Second, it has in the mid point range of other places in the local area when ranked by rent as a percent of income is over 50pct at 14% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Tainter Lake CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 1% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 15% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 32% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 16% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 7% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1. Next it has the largest proportion of housing cost over $3,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $3,480 which is the highest of all places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region. Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Tainter Lake CDP is 46.5% larger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,308, Tainter Lake CDP is only about 5.2% larger.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Tainter Lake CDP has one of the largest proportions of pay extra for utilities at 98% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Elk Mound with 100%. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by pay extra for utilities of all the other places in the greater region in terms of utilities included in rent at 2% of the total.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin has the smallest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 9% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 53% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of rent between $1,500 and $2,500 at 10% of the total and is ranked #1.

Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Tainter Lake CDP has the largest proportion of 2nd mortgage or heloc-not both at 13% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of with heloc at 11% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of no 2nd mortgage and no heloc at 53% of the total.

Tainter Lake CDP Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 2.8 which is the smallest in terms of family members per housing unit of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Elk Mound which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.6 (30.6% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Tainter Lake CDP is about 20.7% smaller. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Tainter Lake CDP is about 10.7% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 6.3 which is the largest of all places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1988 which is the largest of all places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region.

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the percentage of homes built in 2014 or later in the center range of other places in the area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 20% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has less than most other places in the local area in terms of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 3% of the total. Furthermore, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 4% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has one of the largest proportions of owner housing units at 969 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Menomonie with 2,298. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of renter housing units at 209 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Menomonie with 3,459.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of one unit detached at 82% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest in order of one unit detached of all the other places in the area when sorted by mobile home at 6% of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $208,300 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $217,200 of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $226,300 of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $177,600 of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $192,800 of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $195,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Next it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $148,200 of the total and is ranked #1. Additionally, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $125,000 of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Tainter Lake CDP residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.3 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Elk Mound which depicts a homeowner household size of 3.0 (30.8% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Tainter Lake CDP shows it has a renter household size of 2.7 which is the second most of all the places in the area. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Knapp which shows a renter household sizes of 2.7 ( only slightly larger). Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Tainter Lake CDP has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2017 or later at 12% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Elk Mound (12%), and #1 Menomonie (13%) are larger. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by renters moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area as measured by renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 1% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2004 which is in the center range of other places in the metro area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Tainter Lake CDP depicts it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2015 which is at the top of all other places in the greater Tainter Lake CDP region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 23% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Wheeler with 53%. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes using wood at 7% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Tainter Lake CDP housing department, Wisconsin department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Tainter Lake CDP depicts it has a total people living in group quarters of 7 which is the third most of all other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Tainter Lake CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Tainter Lake CDP has the largest proportion of number of people 18 years of age and older living in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.