Sayner CDP Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Sayner CDP Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Sayner CDP shows it has a housing units of 262 which is less than most other places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Sayner CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Sayner CDP depicts it has a housing density of 143.5 which is the second smallest in terms of housing density of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Minocqua CDP which depicts a density of 747.9 ( substantially bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Sayner CDP is approximately 3.7 times bigger. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.6, Sayner CDP is approximately 2.9 times bigger.

In Figure 4, Sayner CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Sayner CDP depicts it has a change in the housing units of 24.8% which is the second most housing units of all the places in the greater Sayner CDP region. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Lac du Flambeau CDP which shows a housing units of 43.1% (74.0% larger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Sayner CDP is very much bigger. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.2%, Sayner CDP is substantially bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Sayner CDP depicts it has a renter percent of 27.4% which is the second smallest when sorted by renter percent of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 72.6% which is the second most owner percent of all the places in the greater Sayner CDP region.

Sayner CDP Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Sayner CDP Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Sayner CDP depicts it has a rental rates of $606 which is less than most other places in the metro area. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Lake Tomahawk CDP which shows a rental rates of $763 (25.9% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Sayner CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $837, Sayner CDP is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Sayner CDP has the percentage of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 the second smallest when sorted by home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the greater region at 12% of the total. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the area in terms of home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 38% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 43% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Boulder Junction CDP with 50%.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Sayner CDP shows it has a median ownership cost of $1,088 which is the second most median ownership cost of all the places in the greater Sayner CDP region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Sayner CDP metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 19% which is less than most other places in the local area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Sayner CDP shows it has a median housing cost of $1,125 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Sayner CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $400 which is the third most median housing cost of all other places in the greater Sayner CDP region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Sayner CDP has the percentage of owner cost less than $300 less than most other places in the surrounding region at 3% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the area when ranked by owner cost between $300 and $500 at 12% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 7% of the total. Also, it has the second smallest when ranked by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the metro area in terms of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 17% of the total. In addition, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 61% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Sayner CDP shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 20% which is the smallest in order of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Lac du Flambeau CDP which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 39% (about twice as large). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Sayner CDP shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 9% which is less than most other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Woodruff CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 21% (approximately 2.4 times bigger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Sayner CDP has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 73% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Sayner CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 2% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 44% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $1,063 which is the second smallest as measured by median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Lac du Flambeau CDP which depicts a taxes paid of $2,618 (approximately 2.5 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Sayner CDP is approximately half the size. Also, in contrast to the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,308, Sayner CDP is approximately a third the size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Sayner CDP Wisconsin. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Sayner CDP has the percentage of pay extra for utilities less than most other places in the local area at 81% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of utilities included in rent at 19% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Lake Tomahawk CDP (20%), and #1 Woodruff CDP (23%) are larger.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Sayner CDP Wisconsin has one of the largest proportions of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 58% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Woodruff CDP with 62%.

Sayner CDP Wisconsin Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Sayner CDP has one of the largest proportions of with mortgage at 83% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Minocqua CDP with 90%. Second, it has the largest proportion of no 2nd mortgage and no heloc at 83% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest as measured by with mortgage of all the other places in the metro area in terms of no mortgage at 17% of the total.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Sayner CDP has one of the largest proportions of houses with mortgages at 83% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Minocqua CDP with 90%. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of houses with a mortgage of all the other places in the greater region as measured by houses without mortgages at 17% of the total.

Sayner CDP Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

The next section of charts provide a wide range of metrics related to the housing market physical characteristics which can be useful for a real estate investor. Figure 27 looks at the number of people living in a typical house in the real estate market starting with the average household size (families and non families). Sayner CDP has the largest proportion of housing density at 2.1 of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 2.3 which is the second smallest as measured by family members per housing unit of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Woodruff CDP which depicts a family members per housing unit of 3.0 (30.2% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Sayner CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, versus the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Sayner CDP is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 5.0 which is the largest of all places in the greater Sayner CDP region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1955 which is the smallest when ranked by year built of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest year built in the area is Woodruff CDP which depicts a year built of 1982 ( only slightly larger).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 4% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 5% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 3% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 19% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 15% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 26% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units the second smallest when ranked by owner-occupied housing units of all the other places in the greater region at 69 of the total. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by owner-occupied housing units of all the other places in the local area in order of renter housing units at 26 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of one unit detached at 97% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $277,500 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the local area in terms of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $110,900 of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $269,400 of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the percentage of occupied housing units the second smallest as measured by occupied housing units of all the other places in the metropolitan area at 36% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of vacant housing units at 64% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Minocqua CDP with 66%.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Sayner CDP residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.1 which is the third most homeowner household size of all other places in the greater Sayner CDP region. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Woodruff CDP which depicts a homeowner household size of 2.6 (21.7% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Sayner CDP shows it has a renter household size of 2.2 which is the largest of all places in the local area. Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2017 or later at 5% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has less than most other places in the local area when sorted by owners moved in 2015 to 2016 at 4% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 53% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Minocqua CDP with 54%. Also, it has less than most other places in the local area when sorted by owners moved in 1989 or earlier at 16% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Sayner CDP has the percentage of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 less than most other places in the metro area at 40% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 47% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 1990 to 1999 at 14% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2003 which is in the mid point range of other places in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Sayner CDP depicts it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2009 which is the second smallest in terms of median year that a renter moved in of all the other places in the metro area.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the percentage of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas less than most other places in the local area at 7% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home using electricity at 2% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes using wood at 32% of the total and is ranked #1.