Rome CDP Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Rome CDP Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2020 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Rome CDP shows it has a Housing Units of 296 which is in the mid point range of other places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Rome CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Rome CDP depicts it has a Housing Density of 79.8 which is the second smallest in order of housing density of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Palmyra which shows a density of 610.4 ( very much bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.9, Rome CDP is about twice as large. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.8, Rome CDP is 60.1% larger.

In Figure 4, Rome CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Rome CDP shows it has a Housing Unit Change of 1.7% which is the second smallest when sorted by change in the housing units of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Helenville CDP which shows a housing units of 26.7% ( considerably bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 5.7%, Rome CDP is approximately a third the size. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.7%, Rome CDP is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Rome CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 7.5% which is the second smallest when ranked by renter percent of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 92.5% which is the second most owner percent of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region.

Rome CDP Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Rome CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Rome CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value of $195,500 which is the third most median home prices of all other places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Dousman which shows a home price of $273,500 (39.9% larger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Rome CDP Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Rome CDP shows it has a Median Gross Rent of $950 which is the second most rental rates of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Dousman which depicts a rental rates of $1,248 (31.4% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,062, Rome CDP is about 11.8% smaller. Also, in comparison with the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $856, Rome CDP is 11.0% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Rome CDP has one of the largest proportions of home price worth less than $50,000 at 7% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Palmyra with 9%.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Rome CDP shows it has a Median Owner Cost of $1,231 which is in the mid range of other places in the metropolitan area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Rome CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 21% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Rome CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 379% which is less than most other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Rome CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,561 which is the third most median housing cost of all other places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $600 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Rome CDP has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 27% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Rome CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 22% which is the third most of all other places in the metro area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Hebron CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 37% (67.7% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Rome CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 9% which is the second smallest as measured by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Palmyra which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 15% (65.6% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Rome CDP has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 50% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 57%. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 30pct to 40pct at 50% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Rome CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 14% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 25% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $3,694 which is the second most median real estate taxes paid of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Dousman which depicts a taxes paid of $4,140 (12.1% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,471, Rome CDP is 49.5% larger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,344, Rome CDP is 10.5% larger.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Rome CDP Wisconsin has one of the largest proportions of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 50% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 100%. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 50% of the total and is ranked #1.

Rome CDP Wisconsin Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Rome CDP has the smallest proportion of with mortgage at 7% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of 2nd mortgage at 2% of the total.

Rome CDP Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.0 which is the second most family members per housing unit of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Sullivan which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.1 ( only slightly larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Rome CDP is about 9.3% smaller. Also, versus the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Rome CDP is about the same size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 6.6 which is at the top of all other places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1973 which is the third most year built of all other places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Dousman which depicts a year built of 1991 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 29% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the metro area when ranked by homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 7% of the total. Third, it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the metro area when ranked by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 21% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units less than most other places in the greater region at 20 of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $199,200 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Jefferson ($231,700), and #1 Dousman ($408,800) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $230,000 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Dousman with $237,500. Third, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $235,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $265,000 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Dousman with $266,100. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $137,500 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Jefferson ($152,000), and #1 Palmyra ($181,300) are larger. Furthermore, it has in the middle range of other places in the metro area in terms of value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $168,200 of the total.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. it has the largest proportion of occupied housing units at 10% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Rome CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.6 which is the third most homeowner household size of all other places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Dousman which depicts a homeowner household size of 2.9 (9.1% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Rome CDP shows it has a Renter-Household Size of 3.0 which is the highest of all places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2017 or later less than most other places in the area at 8% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2015 to 2016 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 40% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the second smallest when ranked by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area in terms of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 14% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Rome CDP has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 84% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by renters moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the greater region when sorted by renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 8% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2005 which is the second most median year that a home owner moved in of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Rome CDP depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2010 which is less than most other places in the greater region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the smallest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 3% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of home using electricity at 8% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes using coal or coke at 1% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Helenville CDP (9%), and #1 Hebron CDP (18%) are larger.