Rome CDP Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Rome CDP Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Rome CDP depicts it has a housing units of 307 which is in the mid range of other places in the area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Rome CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Rome CDP depicts it has a housing density of 82.8 which is the second smallest in terms of housing density of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Jefferson which depicts a density of 591.9 ( appreciably bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Rome CDP is about twice as large. Also, versus the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.6, Rome CDP is 66.9% larger.

In Figure 4, Rome CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Rome CDP shows it has a change in the housing units of 5.5% which is the second most of all the places in the area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Hebron CDP which shows a housing units of 21.6% (approximately 3.9 times bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Rome CDP is 12.7% larger. Also, compared with the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.2%, Rome CDP is approximately 2.5 times bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Rome CDP depicts it has a renter percent of 7.9% which is the second smallest as measured by renter percent of all the other places in the local area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 92.1% which is the second most of all the places in the metro area.

Rome CDP Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Rome CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Rome CDP shows it has a median home price of $200,900 which is the third most of all other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Dousman which depicts a home price of $246,400 (22.6% larger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Rome CDP Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Rome CDP shows it has a rental rates of $920 which is the second most rental rates of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Dousman which depicts a rental rates of $1,235 (34.2% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Rome CDP is about 11.2% smaller. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $837, Rome CDP is 9.9% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Rome CDP has the percentage of home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 less than most other places in the greater region at 41% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 34% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Dousman with 40%.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Rome CDP shows it has a median ownership cost of $1,262 which is the third most median ownership cost of all other places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Rome CDP metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 23% which is the second most of all the places in the local area. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Rome CDP shows it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 389% which is in the center range of other places in the local area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Rome CDP depicts it has a median housing cost of $1,523 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $565 which is less than most other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Rome CDP has the largest proportion of owner cost less than $300 at 2% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Rome CDP depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 23% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Hebron CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 42% (about twice as large). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Rome CDP depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 22% which is more than all other places in the metro area.

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Rome CDP has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 55% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 100%. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 45% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Rome CDP has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $3,769 which is the second most median real estate taxes paid of all the places in the greater Rome CDP region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Dousman which depicts a taxes paid of $3,872 (only about 2.7% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Rome CDP is 58.7% larger. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,308, Rome CDP is 13.9% larger.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Rome CDP Wisconsin. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Rome CDP has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Rome CDP Wisconsin has one of the largest proportions of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 68% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 100%. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 32% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Dousman with 48%.

Rome CDP Wisconsin Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Rome CDP has the largest proportion of 2nd mortgage at 7% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of with heloc at 4% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of no mortgage at 33% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Palmyra (40%), and #1 Hebron CDP (43%) are larger.

Rome CDP Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

The next section of charts provide a wide range of metrics related to the housing market physical characteristics which can be useful for a real estate investor. Figure 27 looks at the number of people living in a typical house in the real estate market starting with the average household size (families and non families). Rome CDP has the largest proportion of housing density at 2.6 of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 3.1 which is in the mid point range of other places in the greater region. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Sullivan which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.3 (only about 5.7% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Rome CDP is about 8.0% smaller. Also, compared with the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Rome CDP is about the same size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 6.5 which is the second most of all the places in the local area. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Helenville CDP which shows an average number of rooms in a house of 7.1 (9.2% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1964 which is the second smallest in order of year built of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Dousman which depicts a year built of 1990 ( only slightly larger).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of homes built in 2014 or later at 2% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 25% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Dousman with 26%. Third, it has the second smallest in terms of homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the local area when ranked by homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 5% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 7% of the total. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 15% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Helenville CDP with 32%. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 6% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Helenville CDP with 10%. Next it has in the mid range of other places in the area as measured by homes built between 1939 or earlier at 25% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units in the center range of other places in the surrounding region at 258 of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the local area as measured by renter housing units at 22 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of one unit detached at 90% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 100%.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $217,500 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Hebron CDP ($361,800), and #1 Dousman ($397,700) are larger. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the local area when ranked by value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $185,000 of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $208,300 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Dousman with $213,500. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $234,400 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Dousman with $270,000. In addition, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $187,500 of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $164,600 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Hebron CDP ($190,000), and #1 Dousman ($275,000) are larger.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Rome CDP residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.6 which is in the mid point range of other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Sullivan which shows a homeowner household size of 3.1 (17.6% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Rome CDP depicts it has a renter household size of 3.0 which is the highest of all places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2017 or later less than most other places in the metropolitan area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 41% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 16% of the total. Also, it has the second smallest when ranked by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the area when ranked by owners moved in 1989 or earlier at 15% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Rome CDP has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 85% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has less than most other places in the metropolitan area in terms of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 8% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 1990 to 1999 at 8% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Helenville CDP with 63%.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2004 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater Rome CDP region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Rome CDP depicts it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2010 which is less than most other places in the greater region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 11% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 26%. Second, it has the second smallest in order of homes using natural gas of all the other places in the surrounding region as measured by home using electricity at 4% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes using kerosene or other fuel oils at 8% of the total and is ranked #1.