Mount Pleasant Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Mount Pleasant Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2020 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Mount Pleasant shows it has a Housing Units of 11,821 which is the second most of all the places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Mount Pleasant housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Mount Pleasant shows it has a Housing Density of 350.9 which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Racine which shows a density of 2167.7 ( quite a bit bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.9, Mount Pleasant is very much bigger. Also, in comparison with the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.8, Mount Pleasant is substantially bigger.

In Figure 4, Mount Pleasant area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Mount Pleasant shows it has a Housing Unit Change of -0.1% which is in the mid point range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Somers which shows a housing units of 6.6% ( considerably bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 5.7%, Mount Pleasant is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.7%, Mount Pleasant is about the same size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Mount Pleasant depicts it has a Renter Percent of 22.9% which is in the mid range of other places in the greater region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 77.1% which is in the center range of other places in the local area.

Mount Pleasant Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Mount Pleasant home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Mount Pleasant shows it has a Median Home Value of $190,800 which is less than most other places in the area. The city with the highest median home price in the area is North Bay which shows a home price of $321,700 (68.6% larger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Mount Pleasant Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Mount Pleasant depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $859 which is in the mid range of other places in the metro area. The city with the highest rental rates in the area is Somers which depicts a rental rates of $972 (13.2% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,062, Mount Pleasant is about 23.6% smaller. Also, in contrast to the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $856, Mount Pleasant is about the same size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Mount Pleasant has one of the largest proportions of home price worth less than $50,000 at 12% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Racine with 37%.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Mount Pleasant depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $1,074 which is less than most other places in the local area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Mount Pleasant metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 17% which is the smallest when ranked by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the surrounding region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Mount Pleasant depicts it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 333% which is in the mid range of other places in the greater region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Mount Pleasant depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,467 which is less than most other places in the greater region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $600 which is in the center range of other places in the metro area.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Mount Pleasant shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 19% which is the smallest in order of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the greater region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is North Bay which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 23% (21.9% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Mount Pleasant shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 13% which is in the center range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Somers which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 14% (6.9% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Mount Pleasant has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct less than most other places in the metropolitan area at 27% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 16% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Sturtevant with 20%. Third, it has less than most other places in the surrounding region when ranked by rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 14% of the total.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $3,584 which is in the mid point range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is North Bay which depicts a taxes paid of $6,250 (74.4% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,471, Mount Pleasant is 45.0% larger. Also, in comparison with the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,344, Mount Pleasant is 7.2% larger.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Mount Pleasant Wisconsin. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Mount Pleasant has one of the largest proportions of pay extra for utilities at 15% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Somers with 19%.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Mount Pleasant Wisconsin has one of the largest proportions of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 41% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Caledonia with 45%. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the local area when ranked by rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 18% of the total. Third, it has in the middle range of other places in the local area when sorted by rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 7% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of rent between $1,500 and $2,500 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of rent between $2,500 and $3,500 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Mount Pleasant Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.0 which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Racine which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.2 (9.9% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Mount Pleasant is about 12.5% smaller. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Mount Pleasant is only about 3.3% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 5.8 which is in the center range of other places in the surrounding region. The city with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is North Bay which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 7.8 (34.5% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1980 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater Mount Pleasant region.

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 21% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 13% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest in order of homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the area in terms of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 9% of the total. Also, it has less than most other places in the metropolitan area when ranked by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 6% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has one of the largest proportions of owner housing units at 2,555 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Racine with 15,038.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of 2 units at 5% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of 3 or 4 units at 12% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of 5 to 9 units at 6% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2014 or later at $416,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $244,800 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Caledonia with $268,700. Third, it has in the middle range of other places in the surrounding region as measured by value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $227,300 of the total. Also, it has less than most other places in the surrounding region as measured by value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $142,200 of the total. In addition, it has less than most other places in the area in order of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $175,300 of the total. Furthermore, it has in the mid point range of other places in the metro area in order of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $193,600 of the total. Next it has in the center range of other places in the metro area in terms of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $159,500 of the total. Additionally, it has less than most other places in the area as measured by value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $121,300 of the total. And then, it has less than most other places in the metro area when ranked by value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $156,900 of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Mount Pleasant residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.4 which is the second smallest in terms of homeowner household size of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Somers which depicts a homeowner household size of 2.6 (8.3% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Mount Pleasant indicates it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.3 which is less than most other places in the metro area. The city with the highest renter household size in the area is Elmwood Park which depicts a renter household sizes of 5.0 (about twice as large). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2015 to 2016 at 18% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Mount Pleasant has the percentage of renters moved in 2017 or later less than most other places in the surrounding region at 24% of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the local area in order of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 36% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 24% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Sturtevant with 29%.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2004 which is the second most median year that a home owner moved in of all the places in the greater Mount Pleasant region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Mount Pleasant depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2013 which is less than most other places in the local area.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 20% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has less than most other places in the local area as measured by homes using solar energy at 1% of the total.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Mount Pleasant housing department, Wisconsin department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Mount Pleasant depicts it has a Total In Group Quarters of 279 which is in the mid range of other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Mount Pleasant residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Mount Pleasant has the percentage of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters in the mid range of other places in the local area at 99% of the total.