Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a housing units of 1,161 which is in the middle range of other places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Lauderdale Lakes CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a housing density of 270.2 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Whitewater which depicts a density of 583.7 (about twice as large). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is considerably bigger. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.6, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is very much bigger.

In Figure 4, Lauderdale Lakes CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a change in the housing units of -4.7% which is less than most other places in the metro area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is East Troy which indicates a housing units of 2.5% ( about the same size). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is about the same size. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.2%, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is about twice as large.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a renter percent of 5.2% which is the second smallest when sorted by renter percent of all the other places in the surrounding region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 94.8% which is the second most owner percent of all the places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region.

Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Lauderdale Lakes CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a median home price of $347,200 which is the largest of all places in the local area. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Lauderdale Lakes CDP indicates it has a rental rates of $875 which is the second most rental rates of all the places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is East Troy which shows a rental rates of $915 (only about 4.6% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is about 16.9% smaller. Also, in comparison with the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $837, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is only about 4.5% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Lauderdale Lakes CDP has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 the second smallest when ranked by home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the metro area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the area when ranked by home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 16% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $400,000 to $500,000 at 10% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $500,000 to $750,000 at 17% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $750,000 to $1,000,000 at 9% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Turtle Lake CDP with 3%. Next it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth $2,000,000 or more at 3% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Turtle Lake CDP with 3%.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a median ownership cost of $1,411 which is the highest of all places in the local area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Lauderdale Lakes CDP metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 22% which is more than all other places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 511% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a median housing cost of $1,875 which is the largest of all places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $1,011 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Lauderdale Lakes CDP has the percentage of owner cost less than $300 less than most other places in the local area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest as measured by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the greater region as measured by owner cost between $500 and $700 at 4% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 15% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 9% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $3,500 and $4,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Lauderdale Lakes CDP indicates it has a cost as a percent of household income of 25% which is more than all other places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Lauderdale Lakes CDP indicates it has a cost as a percent of household income of 15% which is the third most cost as a percent of household income of all other places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Palmyra which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 17% (12.8% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Lauderdale Lakes CDP has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 40% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 East Troy (41%), and #1 Lake Lorraine CDP (60%) are larger. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 40% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Lauderdale Lakes CDP has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 14% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $5,448 which is the most of all places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is approximately 2.3 times bigger. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,308, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is 64.7% larger.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Lauderdale Lakes CDP has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin has one of the largest proportions of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 20% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Lake Lorraine CDP with 40%. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 64% of the total and is ranked #1.

Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Lauderdale Lakes CDP has the smallest proportion of with mortgage at 54% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of 2nd mortgage or heloc-not both at 20% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of with heloc at 17% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the smallest proportion of no 2nd mortgage and no heloc at 34% of the total. In addition, it has the largest proportion of no mortgage at 46% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Lauderdale Lakes CDP has the smallest proportion of houses with mortgages at 54% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of houses without mortgages at 46% of the total and is ranked #1.

Lauderdale Lakes CDP Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 2.9 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Whitewater which depicts a family members per housing unit of 3.1 (6.8% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is about 14.2% smaller. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Lauderdale Lakes CDP is only about 4.7% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 6.4 which is the largest of all places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1982 which is the third most year built of all other places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Elkhorn which shows a year built of 1983 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 23% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being East Troy with 25%. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 15% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest as measured by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the local area when ranked by homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 11% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 13% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the surrounding region when sorted by homes built between 1939 or earlier at 12% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units less than most other places in the greater region at 458 of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the area when sorted by renter housing units at 25 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of one unit detached at 92% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Lake Lorraine CDP with 100%. Second, it has less than most other places in the greater region as measured by 20 to 49 units at 0% of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $379,400 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $247,400 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Lake Lorraine CDP ($262,500), and #1 Turtle Lake CDP ($315,000) are larger. Third, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $225,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $400,000 of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $281,300 of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $619,600 of the total and is ranked #1. Next it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $593,800 of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the smallest proportion of occupied housing units at 42% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of vacant housing units at 58% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Lauderdale Lakes CDP residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.3 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Whitewater which shows a homeowner household size of 2.8 (21.0% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Lauderdale Lakes CDP shows it has a renter household size of 2.1 which is in the middle range of other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Whitewater which shows a renter household sizes of 2.2 (only about 4.3% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2017 or later at 4% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Lauderdale Lakes CDP has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 50% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 35% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 15% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Elkhorn (19%), and #1 Palmyra (29%) are larger.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2003 which is less than most other places in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Lauderdale Lakes CDP depicts it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2014 which is the second most median year that a renter moved in of all the places in the greater Lauderdale Lakes CDP region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of homes using natural gas at 94% of the total and is ranked #1.