Hazel Green Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Hazel Green Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Hazel Green depicts it has a housing units of 498 which is the third most housing units of all other places in the greater Hazel Green region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Hazel Green housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Hazel Green depicts it has a housing density of 384.4 which is in the mid range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Cuba City which shows a density of 758.0 (about twice as large). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Hazel Green is considerably bigger. Also, versus the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.6, Hazel Green is considerably bigger.

In Figure 4, Hazel Green area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Hazel Green depicts it has a change in the housing units of -10.6% which is the smallest when sorted by change in the housing units of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Kieler CDP which shows a housing units of 7.5% ( about the same size). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Hazel Green is about twice as large. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.2%, Hazel Green is approximately 4.9 times bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Hazel Green depicts it has a renter percent of 31.2% which is the second most renter percent of all the places in the greater Hazel Green region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 68.8% which is the second smallest as measured by owner percent of all the other places in the greater region.

Hazel Green Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Hazel Green home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Hazel Green shows it has a median home price of $127,000 which is the second smallest as measured by median home price of all the other places in the greater region. The city with the highest median home price in the area is Sandy Hook CDP which shows a home price of $211,200 (66.3% larger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Hazel Green Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Hazel Green shows it has a rental rates of $725 which is the second most rental rates of all the places in the greater Hazel Green region. The city with the highest rental rates in the area is Menominee which shows a rental rates of $1,000 (37.9% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Hazel Green is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $837, Hazel Green is about 15.4% smaller.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Hazel Green has the largest proportion of home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 61% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Hazel Green depicts it has a median ownership cost of $686 which is the smallest as measured by median ownership cost of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Hazel Green metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 15% which is the second smallest when ranked by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the surrounding region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Hazel Green depicts it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 296% which is the second smallest when sorted by median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Hazel Green shows it has a median housing cost of $925 which is the smallest when sorted by median housing cost of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $420 which is the second smallest in order of median housing cost of all the other places in the metro area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Hazel Green has one of the largest proportions of owner cost less than $300 at 8% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Menominee with 11%. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 22% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Galena with 23%. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 17% of the total.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Hazel Green shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 16% which is the smallest when sorted by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the surrounding region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Sandy Hook CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 24% (55.1% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Hazel Green shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 13% which is the third most of all other places in the greater region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Kieler CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 14% (6.2% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Hazel Green has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct at 19% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the greater region when sorted by rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 16% of the total. Third, it has in the mid range of other places in the metro area in terms of rent as a percent of income is between 30pct to 40pct at 18% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 11% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is over 50pct at 13% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Hazel Green has the largest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 31% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 5% of the total.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $1,864 which is the smallest as measured by median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Kieler CDP which depicts a taxes paid of $2,965 (59.1% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Hazel Green is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,308, Hazel Green is approximately half the size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Hazel Green Wisconsin. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Hazel Green has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Hazel Green Wisconsin has one of the largest proportions of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 19% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Cuba City with 27%. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the greater region as measured by rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 34% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 42% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 4% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Benton (13%), and #1 Menominee (50%) are larger.

Hazel Green Wisconsin Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Hazel Green has one of the largest proportions of no mortgage at 44% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Galena (47%), and #1 Sandy Hook CDP (47%) are larger.

Hazel Green Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 2.9 which is in the middle range of other places in the metro area. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Menominee which depicts a family members per housing unit of 3.3 (12.9% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Hazel Green is about 15.4% smaller. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Hazel Green is about 5.8% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 5.2 which is the smallest when ranked by average number of rooms in a house of all the other places in the area. The city with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Benton which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 6.3 (21.2% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1971 which is in the middle range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest year built in the area is Kieler CDP which depicts a year built of 1975 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 4% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Kieler CDP with 7%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 3% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 33% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Sandy Hook CDP with 44%. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 13% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has less than most other places in the area when sorted by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 3% of the total. Furthermore, it has in the mid range of other places in the local area as measured by homes built between 1939 or earlier at 20% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units in the middle range of other places in the surrounding region at 295 of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of renter housing units at 134 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Cuba City (211), and #1 Galena (529) are larger.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of 2 units at 11% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Kieler CDP with 12%. Second, it has the largest proportion of 10 to 19 units at 4% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 in the middle range of other places in the local area at $168,800 of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the surrounding region in terms of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $156,300 of the total. Third, it has less than most other places in the area when ranked by value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $137,100 of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $116,700 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Cuba City ($127,800), and #1 Menominee ($162,500) are larger. In addition, it has in the middle range of other places in the metro area when sorted by value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $109,700 of the total. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $90,600 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Benton ($98,800), and #1 Cuba City ($117,200) are larger. Next it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $123,800 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Galena ($129,700), and #1 Menominee ($137,500) are larger.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the percentage of occupied housing units the second smallest in terms of occupied housing units of all the other places in the metropolitan area at 86% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of vacant housing units at 14% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Galena with 19%.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Hazel Green residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.4 which is less than most other places in the local area. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Cuba City which shows a homeowner household size of 2.6 (8.4% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Hazel Green shows it has a renter household size of 2.2 which is the second most renter household sizes of all the places in the greater Hazel Green region. The city with the highest renter household size in the area is Menominee which depicts a renter household sizes of 3.8 (66.7% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2015 to 2016 the second smallest as measured by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area at 3% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the greater region when ranked by owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 27% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 1989 or earlier at 29% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Hazel Green has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2017 or later at 10% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has less than most other places in the greater region in order of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 7% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 35% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 1997 which is the smallest when sorted by median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Hazel Green shows it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2012 which is in the mid point range of other places in the greater region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the percentage of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas the second smallest in order of homes using natural gas of all the other places in the local area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of home using electricity at 20% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has less than most other places in the metro area when ranked by homes using kerosene or other fuel oils at 1% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes using some other fuel at 2% of the total and is ranked #1.