Florence CDP Wisconsin Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Florence CDP Wisconsin housing market data taken from the most recent 2020 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Florence CDP shows it has a Housing Units of 326 which is the second smallest in order of housing units of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Florence CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Florence CDP depicts it has a Housing Density of 191.9 which is the second smallest as measured by housing density of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Kingsford which shows a density of 577.0 (approximately 3.0 times bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.9, Florence CDP is approximately 4.9 times bigger. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, housing density of 49.8, Florence CDP is approximately 3.8 times bigger.

In Figure 4, Florence CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Florence CDP shows it has a Housing Unit Change of -2.4% which is in the mid range of other places in the area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Alpha which depicts a housing units of 11.5% (approximately 4.8 times bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 5.7%, Florence CDP is about the same size. Also, in comparison with the state of Wisconsin, change in the housing units of 2.7%, Florence CDP is about the same size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Florence CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 50.8% which is more than all other places in the local area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 49.2% which is the smallest when sorted by owner percent of all the other places in the local area.

Florence CDP Wisconsin Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Florence CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Florence CDP indicates it has a Median Home Value of $72,500 which is less than most other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Kingsford which shows a home price of $93,000 (28.3% larger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Florence CDP Wisconsin metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Florence CDP shows it has a Median Gross Rent of $275 which is the smallest when ranked by rental rates of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Quinnesec CDP which depicts a rental rates of $783 (approximately 2.8 times bigger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,062, Florence CDP is approximately a quarter the size. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, rental rates of $856, Florence CDP is approximately a third the size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Florence CDP has one of the largest proportions of home price worth less than $50,000 at 53% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Quinnesec CDP with 55%. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the local area as measured by home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 6% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 14% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Florence CDP shows it has a Median Owner Cost of $465 which is the smallest as measured by median ownership cost of all the other places in the area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Florence CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 12% which is the second smallest when sorted by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the greater region.

The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Florence CDP shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 122% which is the smallest as measured by median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the other places in the metro area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Florence CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $595 which is the smallest in terms of median housing cost of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $282 which is the smallest in terms of median housing cost of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Florence CDP has the smallest proportion of owner cost less than $300 at 10% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 32% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 3% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 9% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Florence CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 14% which is the second smallest in terms of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Alpha which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 39% (approximately 2.9 times bigger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Florence CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 9% which is the second smallest when ranked by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Alpha which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 18% (about twice as large).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Florence CDP has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct less than most other places in the greater region at 22% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 40% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Alpha with 67%.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Florence CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 14% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $300 and $500 at 18% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 2% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 7% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $767 which is the smallest when ranked by median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Kingsford which depicts a taxes paid of $1,870 (approximately 2.4 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,471, Florence CDP is approximately a third the size. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, median real estate taxes paid of $3,344, Florence CDP is approximately a quarter the size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Florence CDP Wisconsin. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Florence CDP has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 65% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Florence CDP Wisconsin has the percentage of rent less than 300 dollars the second smallest as measured by rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the greater region at 8% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 4% of the total.

Florence CDP Wisconsin Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Florence CDP has the smallest proportion of both 2nd mortgage and heloc at 39% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of no 2nd mortgage and no heloc at 61% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Florence CDP has the largest proportion of houses with mortgages at 61% of the total and is ranked #1.

Florence CDP Wisconsin Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 2.4 which is the smallest in order of family members per housing unit of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Alpha which depicts a family members per housing unit of 3.8 (57.2% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Florence CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Florence CDP is about 24.9% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 4.3 which is the smallest in order of average number of rooms in a house of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Niagara which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 6.0 (39.5% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1961 which is the third most year built of all other places in the greater Florence CDP region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Quinnesec CDP which depicts a year built of 1973 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units less than most other places in the local area at 120 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of one unit attached at 9% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of 2 units at 7% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of 10 to 19 units at 11% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $137,500 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has in the center range of other places in the local area when ranked by value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $59,500 of the total.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of occupied housing units at 28% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Alpha with 33%.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Florence CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.2 which is the second smallest as measured by homeowner household size of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Iron Mountain which depicts a homeowner household size of 2.6 (20.1% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Florence CDP depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 1.2 which is the smallest in terms of renter household size of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Niagara which indicates a renter household sizes of 2.0 (64.2% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2017 or later in the mid point range of other places in the surrounding region at 11% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 31% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Alpha with 40%. Third, it has the second smallest as measured by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the metropolitan area when ranked by owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 13% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Florence CDP has the percentage of renters moved in 2017 or later in the middle range of other places in the metro area at 20% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 21% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 31% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 1990 to 1999 at 11% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2002 which is in the middle range of other places in the greater region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Florence CDP depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2011 which is the smallest in terms of median year that a renter moved in of all the other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 18% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Florence CDP housing department, Wisconsin department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Florence CDP shows it has a Total In Group Quarters of 55 which is the third most of all other places in the local area.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Florence CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Florence CDP has the largest proportion of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.