Spring Green Wisconsin Income Charts

This section shows the Spring Green Wisconsin economy using the most recent economic analysis from the 2020 Census Bureau. Starting with Figure 1 which shows the median earnings per worker, Spring Green shows it has a Median earnings of $52,639 which is the highest of all places in the greater Spring Green region. Comparing median earnings per worker to the United States average of $49,041, Spring Green is 7.3% larger. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, median earnings per worker of $48,208, Spring Green is 9.2% larger.

In Figure 2 a more complete view of income is shown which aggregates income from all members in the household and it has a Median household income of $67,426 which is more than all other places in the greater Spring Green region. Comparing median household income to the United States average of $62,843, Spring Green is 7.3% larger. Also, in contrast to the state of Wisconsin, median household income of $61,747, Spring Green is 9.2% larger.

The next section examines a variety of different income statistics for the Spring Green metropolitan area. In Figure 3 we see that it it has one of the largest proportions of earnings less than $10,000 at 7.4% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Gotham CDP with 11.0%. Second, it has less than most other places in the area when sorted by earnings between $10,000 and $14,999 at 3.1% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of earnings between $15,000 and $19,999 at 27.9% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of earnings between $20,000 and $49,999 at 30.3% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of earnings between $50,000 and $74,999 at 8.2% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of earnings between $75,000 and $99,999 at 6.7% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 5 has the Average number of hours worked in a typical work week during the year, it has a Avg Hours Worked of 40.6 which is the largest of all places in the greater Spring Green region. Dividing median annual worker earnings by the average number of hours worked in a year in Figure 6 shows that it has a Avg Hrly Earnings of $24.93 which is the second most of all the places in the metro area. The city with the highest average hourly earnings in the area is Plain which depicts an average hourly earnings of $25.95 (only about 4.1% larger). Comparing average hourly earnings to the United States average of $24.31, Spring Green is only about 2.6% larger. Also, measured against the state of Wisconsin, average hourly earnings of $24.02, Spring Green is only about 3.8% larger.

Figure 7 examines the number of self employed people in the Spring Green metro area based on the number of people who reported any self employment income. Spring Green shows it has a Self Employed of 16.1% which is more than all other places in the greater Spring Green region.

Turning our attention to Figure 8, the median household income by age group, it has one of the largest proportions of median income-under 25 years at $76,667 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Plain ($81,250), and #1 Arena ($86,563) are larger. Second, it has the largest proportion of median income-25 to 44 years at $94,167 of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of median income-45 to 64 years at $41,667 of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 9 breaks down the source of income and Spring Green has the largest proportion of income from wages at 6.3% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next chart (Figure 11) shows the percentage of households that had retirement income over the last 12 months and it has a With Retirement Income of 19.7% which is at the top of all other places in the greater Spring Green region.

In the next chart, Figure 12, the median family income is shown for families broken down by racial group and it has one of the largest proportions of overall family income at $82,206 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Plain with $85,625.

Figure 13 shows the cost of living and other consumer spending categories for a variety of cost components from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Spring Green shows it has the hightest cost of 105.2 for the cost of utilities grouping.

Spring Green Wisconsin Labor Force Charts

The next two charts look at very recent, monthly trended employment related performance using data estimated by economists at the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The BLS tracks unemployment statistics for a large number of areas throughout the country on a month to month basis. However, not every location in the U.S. is tracked by the BLS so the chart will only show the closest location available (which may be the same location.) Figure 14 shows the monthly unemployment rate for the area as well as a comparison to the overall national economy measure for the United States. Note that in March to April 2020, the Covid 19 recession or great recession occurred and affects this metric. . It depicts that from February 2010 to before the Wuhan Coronavirus Pandemic the monthly unemployment rate went from 6.2% to 2.3% in February 2020. This represents a decrease in the monthly unemployment rate of 62.9%. Since that time, the monthly unemployment rate has gone to 3.9% This represents an increase in the monthly unemployment rate of 69.6%. In Figure 15 the monthly labor force participation which are people actively looking for work are also defined as unemployed but do not include people who have given up looking for work. . It shows that from February 2010 to before the disasterous COVID Pandemic the monthly labor force participation went from 141,833 to 157,023 in February 2020. This represents an increase in the monthly labor force participation of 10.7%. Since that time, the monthly labor force participation has gone to 157,457 This represents an increase in the monthly labor force participation of very little.

The next two charts look at the annual unemployment rate/eligible for unemployment benefits and is based on the American Community survey. Figure 16 shows Spring Green depicts it has a Unemployment Rate of 0.7% which is less than most other places in the metro area. The city with the highest unemployment rate in the area is Lone Rock which depicts a rate of 2.1% (approximately 3.2 times bigger). Figure 17 shows the labor force participation using the estimated percentage of people either working or actively looking for work. Spring Green depicts it has a Labor Force Participation of 63.0% which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area.

The percentage of full-time workers are compared to the number of part-time workers in Figure 19. Spring Green depicts full time employees approximately 3.9 times bigger as the part time employees.

The next employment related data item is shown in Figure 21 which is the percentage of families with only a single earner in the greater Spring Green area. Spring Green shows it has a Single Earner Families of 18.3% which is the second smallest as measured by families with a single earner of all the other places in the area. The city with the highest families with a single earner in the area is Gotham CDP which shows a single earners rate of 57.4% (approximately 3.1 times bigger). The percentage of families with no one working is depicted in Figure 22. Spring Green depicts it has a Families with No One Working of 10.2% which is the third most families with no one working of all other places in the greater Spring Green region. The city with the highest families with no one working in the area is Lone Rock which depicts a families with no worker of 23.7% (approximately 2.3 times bigger).

Spring Green Wisconsin Poverty Charts

The next section details economy analysis about poverty for residents of the Spring Green community. This performance can be enhanced by government programs such as economic opportunity zone to influence manufacturing, job growth, economic opportunity an hopefully lead to economic recovery after the recent Covid 19 recession. In Figure 23 the total number of people earning less than the poverty level are shown. Spring Green shows it has a Total In Poverty of 102 which is the second most total people earning less than the poverty level of all the places in the greater Spring Green region. The city with the highest total people earning less than the poverty level in the area is Lone Rock which shows a total people earning less than the poverty level of 167 (63.7% larger).

In Figure 24 the percentage of people earning less than the poverty level is shown and compared across the group of places. Spring Green shows it has a Percent of Population In Poverty of 6.4% which is the smallest when sorted by percent of people earning less than the poverty level of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest percent of people earning less than the poverty level in the area is Lone Rock which depicts a percent of people in poverty of 19.1% (approximately 3.0 times bigger).

In Figure 25 people who are in poverty are broken out by age group. Spring Green has the percentage of person in poverty under 12 years the second smallest in order of person in poverty under 12 years of all the other places in the metro area at 4% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of person in poverty 12 to 17 years at 28% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Lone Rock (29%), and #1 Ridgeway (35%) are larger. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of person in poverty 18 to 34 years at 27% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Arena with 35%. Also, it has the second smallest when ranked by person in poverty under 12 years of all the other places in the surrounding region when sorted by person in poverty 35 to 54 years at 5% of the total. In addition, it has less than most other places in the area in terms of person in poverty 55 to 64 years at 16% of the total.

The next chart, Figure 26, shows the percentage of people in poverty by racial group. Spring Green has the largest proportion of white poverty rate at 100% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of american indian poverty rate at 9% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Arena with 100%.

Figure 27 shows key poverty statistics for groups based on marriage status. Spring Green has the percentage of married with children and in poverty less than most other places in the area at 13% of the total.

The next chart looks at the percentage of people in poverty based on their education level in Figure 28 marriage status. Spring Green has the smallest proportion of less than highschool in poverty at 7% of the total. Figure 29 looks at only those people who make less than the poverty level of income and breaks down there employment status. Spring Green has one of the largest proportions of people who are in poverty and unemployed at 30.4% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Ridgeway (31.7%), and #1 Gotham CDP (40.9%) are larger. Additionally, Figure 30 looks at the percentage of people who receive some form of public assistance including general assistance, temporary assistance or food stamps (i.e. SNAP.) Spring Green depicts it has a Public Assistance Percent of 6.9% which is the smallest as measured by households with public assistance of all the other places in the area. The city with the highest households with public assistance in the area is Sextonville CDP which depicts a households with public assistance of 22.9% (approximately 3.3 times bigger).

Figure 31 shows the "Gini Index of Income Inequality" with a range from zero (perfect equality) to one (perfect inequality). Spring Green shows it has a Gini Index of 38.4% which is in the intermediate range of other places in the metro area.

Spring Green Wisconsin Work Commute Charts

The following set of charts detail a variety of metrics that have economic impact, economic grow factors and economic development metrics in the Spring Green community and has an impact on other factors such as economic growth, population growth, economic recovery, job growth, etc.. Figure 32 shows a high level view of how the population commutes to work (including the percent of people who work from home.) Spring Green has the largest proportion of people who drive a car or motorcycle to work at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of people who take public transportation to work at 6% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of people who bicycle or walk to work at 9% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 33 shows a more detailed view of how the population commutes to work for (for example to downtown Spring Green or elsewhere.) Spring Green has the percentage of people who drove alone the second smallest in order of people who drove alone of all the other places in the local area at 78% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of people who take the bus at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of people who bike at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of people who work from home at 9% of the total and is ranked #1.

In Figure 35 is shown a frequency distribution of the time that people leave for work. Spring Green has the percentage of people who leave for work between 12am to 5am less than most other places in the surrounding region at 3% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of people who leave for work between 6am to 630am at 7% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of people who leave for work between 630 am to 7am at 25% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of people who leave for work between 8am to 830am at 3% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of people who leave for work between 830 am to 9am at 4% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of people who leave for work between 9am to 10am at 5% of the total and is ranked #1. Next it has less than most other places in the metropolitan area when sorted by people who leave for work between 12noon to 4pm at 6% of the total.

The next graph in Figure 36 shows the average number of minutes that it takes for people to commute to work. Spring Green has the largest proportion of people with commute time of less than 5 minutesutes at 24% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of people with commute time between 5 to 9 minutes at 3% of the total. Third, it has less than most other places in the metropolitan area when ranked by people with commute time between 10 to 14 minutes at 10% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of people with commute time between 15 to 19 minutes at 3% of the total. In addition, it has the largest proportion of people with commute time between 45 to 59 minutes at 13% of the total and is ranked #1.

The average commute time is shown in Figure 37. Spring Green depicts it has a Avg Commute Time of 25 which is the second smallest as measured by average commute time of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 38 shows the difference between male versus female commuting time. Spring Green shows average commute time in minutes for men 7.0% larger as the average commute time in minutes for women. Figure 40 shows the total number of vehicles available for transportation and Spring Green has the percentage of no vehicle available less than most other places in the metropolitan area at 16% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of 1 vehicle available at 61% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of 2 vehicles available at 19% of the total. Also, it has the second smallest when ranked by no vehicle available of all the other places in the metropolitan area in terms of 3 vehicles available at 3% of the total. Figure 41 shows the percentage of people who both work and live in the same city (town or place.) Spring Green depicts it has a Work in city or place where live of 41% which is is the uppermost of the places in the greater region. Comparing people who both work and live in the same city to the United States average of 42%, Spring Green is only about 2.9% smaller. Also, benchmarked against the state of Wisconsin, people who both work and live in the same city of 40%, Spring Green is only about 2.7% larger.

Spring Green Wisconsin Jobs Charts

The next to charts break out the median earnings for major job categories for men and women. Figure 46 shows the median earnings of men for the job categories. Spring Green depicts it has the hightest median earnings of $85,313 for the earnings-natural resources, construction, maintenance occupations category. Similarly, Figure 47 shows the median earnings of women for the job categories and Spring Green shows it has the hightest median earnings of $61,250 for the earnings-healthcare practitioners and tech occupations category. The table in Figure 48, shows Spring Green employment data in terms of job categories and salary data.

Spring Green Wisconsin Self Employment Charts

Figure 49 shows economic activity in terms of the number of people who are self employed in incorporated local business by industry. Spring Green depicts it has the hightest entrepreneurs of 33% for the self employed in production, transportation, and material moving businesses group.

Similar to the last chart is Figure 50 which shows the number of people who are self employed but in more detailed industry categories such as manufacturing, retail sales, residential real estate, commercial real estate, health care, exports/imports, and advanced industries, etc. Spring Green depicts it has the hightest entrepreneurs of 36% for the self employed in manufacturing grouping.

In Figure 51 the average annual self employment/entrepreneur income is shown. Spring Green depicts it has a Self Employment Income of $32,402 which is the largest of all places in the greater Spring Green region. Comparing average annual self employment income to the United States average of $39,154, Spring Green is about 20.8% smaller. Also, compared to the state of Wisconsin, average annual self employment income of $33,386, Spring Green is only about 3.0% smaller.

Figure 52 shows the difference between the number of self employed men and self employed women (i.e. entrepreneurs.) Spring Green depicts total number of self-employed men 43.8% larger as the total number of self-employed women.