Pittman Center Tennessee Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Pittman Center Tennessee housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Pittman Center shows it has a Housing Units of 512 which is the second smallest when ranked by housing units of all the other places in the metropolitan area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Pittman Center housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Pittman Center shows it has a Housing Density of 84.4 which is the second smallest as measured by housing density of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Newport which depicts a density of 599.9 ( considerably bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, Pittman Center is about twice as large. Also, compared with the state of Tennessee, housing density of 72.9, Pittman Center is 15.8% larger.

In Figure 4, Pittman Center area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Pittman Center shows it has a Housing Unit Change of -5.9% which is less than most other places in the greater region. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Dandridge which depicts a housing units of 11.2% (about twice as large). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, Pittman Center is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of Tennessee, change in the housing units of 7.1%, Pittman Center is about the same size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Pittman Center depicts it has a Renter Percent of 20.5% which is the second smallest in terms of renter percent of all the other places in the surrounding region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 79.5% which is the second most of all the places in the local area.

Pittman Center Tennessee Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Pittman Center home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Pittman Center shows it has a Median Home Value of $256,300 which is more than all other places in the greater Pittman Center region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Pittman Center Tennessee metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Pittman Center shows it has a Median Gross Rent of $693 which is less than most other places in the greater region. The city with the highest rental rates in the area is Gatlinburg which shows a rental rates of $899 (29.7% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,163, Pittman Center is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, measured against the state of Tennessee, rental rates of $951, Pittman Center is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Pittman Center has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 in the center range of other places in the metropolitan area at 4% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the local area when ranked by home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 31% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 18% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $300,000 to $400,000 at 7% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $750,000 to $1,000,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Next it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Pittman Center shows it has a Median Owner Cost of $850 which is the third most median ownership cost of all other places in the greater Pittman Center region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Pittman Center metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 16% which is in the mid range of other places in the greater region.

The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Pittman Center depicts it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 677% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Pittman Center region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Pittman Center shows it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,294 which is the third most median housing cost of all other places in the greater Pittman Center region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $403 which is less than most other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Pittman Center has the percentage of owner cost between $300 and $500 less than most other places in the metro area at 13% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 10% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Pittman Center shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 20% which is in the center range of other places in the greater region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Fairgarden CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 43% (about twice as large). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Pittman Center depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 9% which is in the center range of other places in the surrounding region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Newport which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 15% (71.1% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Pittman Center has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct the second smallest in terms of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the greater region at 5% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 58% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 7% of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 23% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Newport with 24%.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Pittman Center has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $981 which is the third most median real estate taxes paid of all other places in the greater Pittman Center region. The city with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Newport which depicts a taxes paid of $1,269 (29.4% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,690, Pittman Center is approximately a third the size. Also, measured against the state of Tennessee, median real estate taxes paid of $1,270, Pittman Center is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Pittman Center Tennessee has the percentage of rent less than 300 dollars less than most other places in the local area at 5% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 49% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 35% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Sevierville (35%), and #1 Gatlinburg (44%) are larger. Also, it has the second smallest when sorted by rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the greater region in terms of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 5% of the total.

Pittman Center Tennessee Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Pittman Center has the smallest proportion of Primary Mortgage with 2nd Mortgage and HELOC at 1% of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the local area in order of With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 41% of the total.

Pittman Center Tennessee Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 4.0 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater Pittman Center region. Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Pittman Center is 19.9% larger. Also, in comparison with the state of Tennessee, family members per housing unit of 3.2, Pittman Center is 24.1% larger.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 4.6 which is less than most other places in the metro area. The city with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Dandridge which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 5.6 (21.7% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1984 which is less than most other places in the local area. The city with the highest year built in the area is Pigeon Forge which depicts a year built of 1994 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2010 to 2019 at 24% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Sevierville (24%), and #1 Pigeon Forge (30%) are larger. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the local area when sorted by homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 13% of the total. Third, it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the surrounding region in order of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 12% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 29% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has in the mid range of other places in the local area when sorted by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 1% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units the second smallest in order of owner-occupied housing units of all the other places in the greater region at 43 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of 10 to 19 units at 13% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Pigeon Forge with 18%. Second, it has the second smallest in order of one unit detached of all the other places in the local area when sorted by 50 or more units at 3% of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $219,400 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Sevierville ($236,100), and #1 Gatlinburg ($341,500) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $260,700 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Sevierville with $276,000. Third, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $254,500 of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $316,700 of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $225,000 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Gatlinburg with $257,800.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of occupied housing units at 59% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Gatlinburg with 71%.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Pittman Center residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 3.2 which is the highest of all places in the greater Pittman Center region.

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Pittman Center shows it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.9 which is the third most renter household sizes of all other places in the greater Pittman Center region. The city with the highest renter household size in the area is Fairgarden CDP which depicts a renter household sizes of 4.1 (39.5% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2015 to 2018 at 38% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has less than most other places in the area when sorted by owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 16% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Pittman Center has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2019 or later at 62% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Newport (63%), and #1 Fairgarden CDP (100%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2015 to 2018 at 36% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Gatlinburg with 44%.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2009 which is the second most of all the places in the greater region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Pittman Center depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2015 which is in the middle range of other places in the metropolitan area.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of homes using natural gas at 8% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes using coal or coke at 11% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes using solar energy at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.