Haywood County Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Haywood County Tennessee housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Haywood County depicts it has a housing units of 8,421 which is the second smallest when sorted by housing units of all the other counties in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Haywood County housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Haywood County depicts it has a housing density of 15.8 which is the smallest as measured by housing density of all the other counties in the metro area. The county with the highest housing density in the area is Madison County which shows a density of 77.1 (approximately 4.9 times bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Haywood County is approximately half the size. Also, measured against the state of Tennessee, housing density of 70.9, Haywood County is approximately a fifth the size.

In Figure 4, Haywood County area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Haywood County depicts it has a change in the housing units of 1.3% which is in the mid range of other counties in the local area. The county with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Fayette County which depicts a housing units of 7.4% ( quite a bit bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Haywood County is approximately a quarter the size. Also, versus the state of Tennessee, change in the housing units of 4.2%, Haywood County is approximately a third the size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Haywood County shows it has a renter percent of 39.6% which is the second most of all the counties in the local area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 60.4% which is the second smallest in terms of owner percent of all the other counties in the metro area.

Haywood County Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Haywood County home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Haywood County shows it has a median home price of $102,200 which is in the mid range of other counties in the area. The county with the highest median home price in the area is Fayette County which shows a home price of $191,200 (about twice as large). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Haywood County Tennessee metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Haywood County depicts it has a rental rates of $642 which is the second smallest when ranked by rental rates of all the other counties in the metropolitan area. The county with the highest rental rates in the area is Madison County which shows a rental rates of $851 (32.6% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Haywood County is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared with the state of Tennessee, rental rates of $841, Haywood County is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Haywood County has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 in the mid range of other counties in the area at 11% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 38% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger county being Hardeman County with 38%.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Haywood County depicts it has a median ownership cost of $760 which is in the mid point range of other counties in the greater region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Haywood County metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 18% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the counties in the greater Haywood County region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Haywood County shows it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 317% which is in the mid range of other counties in the metropolitan area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Haywood County depicts it has a median housing cost of $994 which is in the mid point range of other counties in the surrounding region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $398 which is the second most of all the counties in the surrounding region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Haywood County has the percentage of owner cost between $300 and $500 in the mid range of other counties in the area at 19% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 28% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Haywood County shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 22% which is the second most of all the counties in the local area. The county with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Hardeman County which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 23% (7.8% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Haywood County depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 13% which is more than all other counties in the greater Haywood County region.

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Haywood County has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct at 6% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger county being Hardeman County with 6%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 15% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 30pct to 40pct at 10% of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is over 50pct at 23% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Lauderdale County (24%), and #1 Madison County (26%) are larger.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Haywood County has the largest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 28% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $799 which is the third most median real estate taxes paid of all other counties in the greater Haywood County region. The county with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Tipton County which depicts a taxes paid of $984 (23.2% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Haywood County is approximately a third the size. Also, compared to the state of Tennessee, median real estate taxes paid of $1,153, Haywood County is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Haywood County Tennessee has the largest proportion of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 42% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 3% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of rent between $1,500 and $2,500 at 1% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of rent over $3,500 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Haywood County Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Haywood County has the largest proportion of 2nd mortgage or heloc-not both at 7% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of with heloc at 4% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of both 2nd mortgage and heloc at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has in the mid range of other counties in the metro area in order of no mortgage at 46% of the total.

Haywood County Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 3.2 which is the third most of all other counties in the local area. The county with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Crockett County which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.4 (6.9% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Haywood County is only about 5.0% smaller. Also, compared to the state of Tennessee, family members per housing unit of 3.2, Haywood County is about the same size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 5.4 which is less than most other counties in the greater region. The county with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Fayette County which shows an average number of rooms in a house of 6.3 (16.7% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1977 which is the second smallest as measured by year built of all the other counties in the area. The county with the highest year built in the area is Fayette County which shows a year built of 1994 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the smallest proportion of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 9% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 16% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 5% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 8% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Lauderdale County (8%), and #1 Crockett County (10%) are larger.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units the second smallest when sorted by owner-occupied housing units of all the other counties in the greater region at 4,287 of the total. Second, it has less than most other counties in the local area when sorted by renter housing units at 2,813 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of one unit attached at 2% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of 10 to 19 units at 3% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest in order of one unit detached of all the other counties in the surrounding region in order of mobile home at 8% of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 2014 or later in the center range of other counties in the local area at $271,400 of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by value of homes built 2014 or later of all the other counties in the local area as measured by value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $180,800 of the total. Third, it has in the intermediate range of other counties in the local area when ranked by value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $153,200 of the total. Also, it has in the mid point range of other counties in the metropolitan area when sorted by value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $118,200 of the total. In addition, it has in the center range of other counties in the surrounding region when sorted by value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $102,900 of the total. Furthermore, it has less than most other counties in the local area when ranked by value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $85,400 of the total. Next it has less than most other counties in the local area as measured by value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $84,000 of the total. Additionally, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $117,700 of the total and is ranked #1. And then, it has the second smallest in order of value of homes built 2014 or later of all the other counties in the local area in terms of value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $70,200 of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $137,500 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger county being Fayette County with $183,600.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Haywood County residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.5 which is in the mid range of other counties in the surrounding region. The county with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Tipton County which shows a homeowner household size of 2.8 (12.4% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Haywood County shows it has a renter household size of 2.4 which is the smallest in order of renter household size of all the other counties in the greater region. The county with the highest renter household size in the area is Crockett County which depicts a renter household sizes of 3.0 (25.3% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 2017 or later at 1% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 1989 or earlier at 26% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Haywood County has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2017 or later at 13% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by renters moved in 2017 or later of all the other counties in the area as measured by renters moved in 1989 or earlier at 2% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 1999 which is the second smallest when ranked by median year that a home owner moved in of all the other counties in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Haywood County depicts it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2012 which is the third most median year that a renter moved in of all other counties in the greater Haywood County region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the smallest proportion of homes using kerosene or other fuel oils at 0% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes using coal or coke at 0% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Haywood County housing department, Tennessee department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Haywood County depicts it has a total people living in group quarters of 226 which is the second smallest as measured by total people living in group quarters of all the other counties in the local area.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Haywood County residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Haywood County has the largest proportion of number of people 18 years of age and older living in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.