Richville CDP Ohio Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Richville CDP Ohio housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Richville CDP shows it has a Housing Units of 1,435 which is in the middle range of other places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Richville CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Richville CDP shows it has a Housing Density of 465.3 which is less than most other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Meyers Lake which shows a density of 2359.3 ( markedly bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, Richville CDP is very much bigger. Also, in comparison with the state of Ohio, housing density of 127.9, Richville CDP is approximately 3.6 times bigger.

In Figure 4, Richville CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Richville CDP shows it has a Housing Unit Change of 4.7% which is in the mid range of other places in the local area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Meyers Lake which shows a housing units of 41.8% ( very much bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, Richville CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, in comparison with the state of Ohio, change in the housing units of 2.1%, Richville CDP is approximately 2.3 times bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Richville CDP shows it has a Renter Percent of 13.5% which is less than most other places in the surrounding region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 86.5% which is the third most owner percent of all other places in the greater Richville CDP region.

Richville CDP Ohio Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Richville CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Richville CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value of $137,900 which is the third most median home prices of all other places in the greater Richville CDP region. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Hills and Dales which shows a home price of $424,000 (approximately 3.1 times bigger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Richville CDP Ohio metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Richville CDP shows it has a Median Gross Rent of $817 which is the second most rental rates of all the places in the greater Richville CDP region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Meyers Lake which depicts a rental rates of $1,271 (55.6% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,163, Richville CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, in comparison with the state of Ohio, rental rates of $870, Richville CDP is about 6.5% smaller.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Richville CDP has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 less than most other places in the local area at 14% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 74% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Richville CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $794 which is less than most other places in the metro area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Richville CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 16% which is in the center range of other places in the metro area.

The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Richville CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 281% which is in the middle range of other places in the metropolitan area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Richville CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,209 which is the third most median housing cost of all other places in the greater Richville CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $431 which is less than most other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Richville CDP has one of the largest proportions of owner cost less than $300 at 26% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Canton with 26%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 6% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 14% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 35% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 1% of the total.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Richville CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 19% which is in the mid range of other places in the local area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Meyers Lake which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 23% (23.3% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Richville CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 11% which is in the center range of other places in the local area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Meyers Lake which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 13% (21.5% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Richville CDP has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct at 39% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the greater region when ranked by rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 14% of the total. Third, it has the second smallest as measured by rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the local area when ranked by rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 4% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Richville CDP has the largest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 31% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 33% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 1% of the total.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $2,018 which is the third most median real estate taxes paid of all other places in the greater Richville CDP region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Hills and Dales which depicts a taxes paid of $8,162 (approximately 4.0 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,690, Richville CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, measured against the state of Ohio, median real estate taxes paid of $2,447, Richville CDP is about 21.3% smaller.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Richville CDP Ohio has one of the largest proportions of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 41% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Perry Heights CDP (42%), and #1 Navarre (42%) are larger. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the metro area in terms of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 29% of the total.

Richville CDP Ohio Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Richville CDP has one of the largest proportions of With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 43% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Meyers Lake (45%), and #1 Hills and Dales (56%) are larger.

Richville CDP Ohio Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 2.8 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Canton which depicts a family members per housing unit of 3.2 (12.8% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Richville CDP is about 17.2% smaller. Also, measured against the state of Ohio, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Richville CDP is about 10.9% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 5.9 which is the second most average number of rooms in a house of all the places in the greater Richville CDP region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Hills and Dales which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 10.0 (69.5% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1965 which is the second most of all the places in the greater region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Meyers Lake which depicts a year built of 1989 ( only slightly larger).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the percentage of homes built between 2010 to 2019 less than most other places in the local area at 3% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 16% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Perry Heights CDP with 24%. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 36% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has less than most other places in the greater region in terms of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 17% of the total. In addition, it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the greater region when sorted by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 9% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units less than most other places in the local area at 188 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of 5 to 9 units at 4% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 less than most other places in the local area at $175,000 of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the greater region when sorted by value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $153,500 of the total. Third, it has less than most other places in the local area when sorted by value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $143,500 of the total. Also, it has in the mid range of other places in the metro area as measured by value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $127,500 of the total. In addition, it has in the mid point range of other places in the local area in order of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $135,400 of the total. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $138,600 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Meyers Lake ($169,300), and #1 Hills and Dales ($408,300) are larger. Next it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $108,000 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Meyers Lake ($187,500), and #1 Hills and Dales ($350,000) are larger.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the smallest proportion of occupied housing units at 3% of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Richville CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.2 which is the second smallest when ranked by homeowner household size of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Perry Heights CDP which depicts a homeowner household size of 2.5 (13.1% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Richville CDP depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 1.8 which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Perry Heights CDP which depicts a renter household sizes of 2.5 (40.4% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2019 or later the second smallest as measured by owners moved in 2019 or later of all the other places in the metro area at 16% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of owners moved in 2019 or later of all the other places in the local area when sorted by owners moved in 2015 to 2018 at 12% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 28% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Richville CDP has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2019 or later at 54% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Meyers Lake (56%), and #1 Hills and Dales (100%) are larger. Second, it has less than most other places in the greater region when sorted by renters moved in 2015 to 2018 at 13% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 20% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Perry Heights CDP (21%), and #1 Meyers Lake (31%) are larger. Also, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 1990 to 1999 at 4% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 1998 which is the smallest when ranked by median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Richville CDP depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2016 which is the largest of all places in the greater Richville CDP region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the smallest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 4% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of home using electricity at 3% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Richville CDP housing department, Ohio department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Richville CDP depicts it has a Total In Group Quarters of 8 which is the second smallest as measured by total people living in group quarters of all the other places in the greater region.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Richville CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Richville CDP has the largest proportion of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.