Pepper Pike Ohio Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Pepper Pike Ohio housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Pepper Pike depicts it has a Housing Units of 2,643 which is the third most of all other places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Pepper Pike housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Pepper Pike shows it has a Housing Density of 371.8 which is in the center range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Mayfield Heights which indicates a density of 2521.1 ( markedly bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, Pepper Pike is very much bigger. Also, measured against the state of Ohio, housing density of 127.9, Pepper Pike is approximately 2.9 times bigger.

In Figure 4, Pepper Pike area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Pepper Pike depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of 12.5% which is the third most housing units of all other places in the greater Pepper Pike region. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Beachwood which depicts a housing units of 19.2% (53.6% larger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, Pepper Pike is 69.4% larger. Also, compared to the state of Ohio, change in the housing units of 2.1%, Pepper Pike is very much bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Pepper Pike depicts it has a Renter Percent of 2.2% which is the smallest when ranked by renter percent of all the other places in the metro area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 97.8% which is at the top of all other places in the metro area.

Pepper Pike Ohio Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Pepper Pike home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Pepper Pike depicts it has a Median Home Value of $455,700 which is the third most of all other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest median home price in the area is Hunting Valley which depicts a home price of $1,461,500 (approximately 3.2 times bigger).

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Pepper Pike has the percentage of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 the second smallest in terms of home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the metro area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $300,000 to $400,000 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $400,000 to $500,000 at 28% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 at 2% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Moreland Hills (3%), and #1 Hunting Valley (29%) are larger. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 at 2% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Moreland Hills (3%), and #1 Hunting Valley (29%) are larger.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Pepper Pike indicates it has a Median Owner Cost of $2,154 which is the third most of all other places in the metropolitan area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Pepper Pike metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 16% which is the second smallest in order of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the greater region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Pepper Pike shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 387% which is less than most other places in the local area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Pepper Pike shows it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $3,065 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Pepper Pike region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $1,341 which is the third most of all other places in the area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Pepper Pike has the percentage of owner cost between $300 and $500 the second smallest in order of owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area at 2% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the metro area when ranked by owner cost between $500 and $700 at 6% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 14% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $3,500 and $4,000 at 13% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Moreland Hills (16%), and #1 Hunting Valley (32%) are larger.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Pepper Pike shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 16% which is the smallest when ranked by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Hunting Valley which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 30% (about twice as large). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Pepper Pike shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 14% which is in the mid range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Woodmere which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 28% (about twice as large).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Pepper Pike has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct less than most other places in the area at 22% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 13% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $10,001 which is the highest of all places in the greater Pepper Pike region. Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,690, Pepper Pike is approximately 3.7 times bigger. Also, compared to the state of Ohio, median real estate taxes paid of $2,447, Pepper Pike is approximately 4.1 times bigger.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Pepper Pike Ohio has the largest proportion of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 52% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent between $2,500 and $3,500 at 13% of the total and is ranked #1.

Pepper Pike Ohio Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Pepper Pike has one of the largest proportions of With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 42% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Moreland Hills (47%), and #1 Hunting Valley (69%) are larger.

Pepper Pike Ohio Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.0 which is the third most family members per housing unit of all other places in the greater Pepper Pike region. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Woodmere which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.2 (6.6% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Pepper Pike is about 11.6% smaller. Also, measured against the state of Ohio, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Pepper Pike is about 5.6% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 10.0 which is at the top of all other places in the greater Pepper Pike region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1969 which is the third most of all other places in the area. The city with the highest year built in the area is Orange which depicts a year built of 1981 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built in 2020 or later at 6% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Beachwood with 9%. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2010 to 2019 at 4% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Hunting Valley (10%), and #1 Orange (16%) are larger. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 20% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 25% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Mayfield Heights with 27%. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 3% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units the second smallest in order of owner-occupied housing units of all the other places in the local area at 54 of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2014 or later at $359,000 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Beachwood ($621,800), and #1 Hunting Valley ($2,000,001) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $892,200 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Moreland Hills ($1,784,700), and #1 Hunting Valley ($2,000,001) are larger. Third, it has in the mid range of other places in the local area when sorted by value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $455,000 of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $651,900 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Moreland Hills ($690,400), and #1 Hunting Valley ($2,000,001) are larger. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $504,500 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunting Valley with $1,535,700. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $446,200 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunting Valley with $1,541,700. Next it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $399,400 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunting Valley with $1,281,300. Additionally, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $565,900 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunting Valley with $1,770,800.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Pepper Pike residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.6 which is the second most homeowner household size of all the places in the greater Pepper Pike region. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Beachwood which shows a homeowner household size of 2.6 ( only slightly larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Pepper Pike depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.0 which is the third most renter household sizes of all other places in the greater Pepper Pike region. The city with the highest renter household size in the area is Orange which depicts a renter household sizes of 2.9 (45.5% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2019 or later at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Pepper Pike has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2019 or later at 73% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2007 which is at the top of all other places in the greater Pepper Pike region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Pepper Pike depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2017 which is more than all other places in the greater Pepper Pike region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the smallest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 6% of the total. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the metro area in order of homes using solar energy at 0% of the total.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Pepper Pike housing department, Ohio department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Pepper Pike depicts it has a Total In Group Quarters of 292 which is the second most number of people in group quarters of all the places in the greater Pepper Pike region.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Pepper Pike residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Pepper Pike has the percentage of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters less than most other places in the metropolitan area at 90% of the total.