Tuckahoe CDP New York Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Tuckahoe CDP New York housing market data taken from the most recent 2021 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Housing Units of 792 which is the second smallest in order of housing units of all the other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Tuckahoe CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Housing Density of 191.0 which is the smallest in order of housing density of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Hampton Bays CDP which depicts a density of 670.7 (approximately 3.5 times bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.2, Tuckahoe CDP is approximately 4.9 times bigger. Also, benchmarked against the state of New York, housing density of 177.5, Tuckahoe CDP is 7.6% larger.

In Figure 4, Tuckahoe CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of -8.4% which is the smallest when sorted by change in the housing units of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Southampton which shows a housing units of 15.7% (about twice as large). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 6.5%, Tuckahoe CDP is 30.7% larger. Also, versus the state of New York, change in the housing units of 3.1%, Tuckahoe CDP is approximately 2.7 times bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 32.1% which is the largest of all places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 67.9% which is the smallest when ranked by owner percent of all the other places in the greater region.

Tuckahoe CDP New York Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Tuckahoe CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Tuckahoe CDP shows it has a Median Home Value of $790,600 which is the second smallest when sorted by median home price of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Water Mill CDP which depicts a home price of $1,669,400 (about twice as large). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Tuckahoe CDP New York metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $1,328 which is the second smallest as measured by rental rates of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Shinnecock Hills CDP which shows a rental rates of $2,558 (about twice as large). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,096, Tuckahoe CDP is 21.2% larger. Also, in contrast to the state of New York, rental rates of $1,315, Tuckahoe CDP is about the same size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Tuckahoe CDP has the largest proportion of home price worth between $400,000 to $500,000 at 37% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $500,000 to $750,000 at 43% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being New Suffolk CDP with 50%. Third, it has the second smallest in order of home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the metropolitan area when sorted by home price worth between $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 at 10% of the total. Also, it has the second smallest in order of home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the area in order of home price worth between $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 at 10% of the total.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $1,816 which is the second smallest in terms of median ownership cost of all the other places in the surrounding region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Tuckahoe CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 30% which is more than all other places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region.

The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Tuckahoe CDP shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 1864% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $4,001 which is the highest of all places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $968 which is the second smallest in terms of median housing cost of all the other places in the area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Tuckahoe CDP has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 14% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being New Suffolk CDP with 14%. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 5% of the total. Also, it has in the mid range of other places in the greater region in terms of owner cost between $3,500 and $4,000 at 18% of the total.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 51% which is more than all other places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region. Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 28% which is the most of all places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region.

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Tuckahoe CDP has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 42% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Shinnecock Hills CDP with 55%. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the surrounding region when ranked by rent as a percent of income is between 30pct to 40pct at 6% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 52% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Tuckahoe CDP has the largest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 26% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 8% of the total.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $5,785 which is the second smallest when ranked by median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Water Mill CDP which depicts a taxes paid of $9,882 (70.8% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,551, Tuckahoe CDP is approximately 2.3 times bigger. Also, in contrast to the state of New York, median real estate taxes paid of $5,590, Tuckahoe CDP is only about 3.5% larger.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Tuckahoe CDP New York has the largest proportion of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 36% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 46% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest in order of rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the local area as measured by rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 13% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of rent between $1,500 and $2,500 at 5% of the total.

Tuckahoe CDP New York Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Tuckahoe CDP has the smallest proportion of With mortgage at 26% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 66% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Tuckahoe CDP has the largest proportion of houses with mortgages at 66% of the total and is ranked #1.

Tuckahoe CDP New York Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 2.9 which is the third most family members per housing unit of all other places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is North Sea CDP which depicts a family members per housing unit of 3.4 (15.1% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Tuckahoe CDP is about 13.3% smaller. Also, measured against the state of New York, family members per housing unit of 3.3, Tuckahoe CDP is about 13.5% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 5.9 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Water Mill CDP which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 7.0 (18.6% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1979 which is the third most year built of all other places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region. The place with the highest year built in the area is North Sea CDP which depicts a year built of 1983 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the smallest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 2% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 32% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the metro area in order of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 10% of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 15% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Southampton (27%), and #1 New Suffolk CDP (48%) are larger.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units in the mid range of other places in the surrounding region at 132 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of one unit attached at 6% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of 5 to 9 units at 8% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 in the mid range of other places in the local area at $986,100 of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $828,100 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Water Mill CDP ($1,345,900), and #1 Southampton ($2,000,001) are larger. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $733,300 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 New Suffolk CDP ($770,800), and #1 Southampton ($1,263,900) are larger. Also, it has less than most other places in the local area as measured by value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $840,600 of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Tuckahoe CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 1.8 which is the smallest when ranked by homeowner household size of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is North Sea CDP which indicates a homeowner household size of 2.7 (49.5% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Tuckahoe CDP shows it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.6 which is less than most other places in the greater region. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Shinnecock Hills CDP which depicts a renter household sizes of 4.3 (66.7% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2019 or later less than most other places in the metro area at 10% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 33% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Tuckahoe CDP has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2019 or later at 73% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Water Mill CDP with 80%. Second, it has less than most other places in the greater region in order of renters moved in 2015 to 2018 at 3% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 1996 which is the smallest in order of median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the metro area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2017 which is more than all other places in the greater Tuckahoe CDP region.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Tuckahoe CDP housing department, New York department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Tuckahoe CDP depicts it has a Total In Group Quarters of 34 which is in the center range of other places in the greater region.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Tuckahoe CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Tuckahoe CDP has the percentage of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters less than most other places in the greater region at 32% of the total.