Upper Fruitland CDP New Mexico Income Charts

This section shows the Upper Fruitland CDP New Mexico economy using the most recent economic analysis from the 2020 Census Bureau. Starting with Figure 1 which shows the median earnings per worker, Upper Fruitland CDP shows it has a Median earnings of $31,953 which is the second smallest as measured by median earnings per worker of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest median earnings per worker in the area is Kirtland CDP which shows a median earnings of $80,363 (approximately 2.5 times bigger). Comparing median earnings per worker to the United States average of $49,041, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of New Mexico, median earnings per worker of $41,480, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately three-fourths the size.

In Figure 2 a more complete view of income is shown which aggregates income from all members in the household and it has a Median household income of $41,023 which is less than most other places in the metro area. The place with the highest median household income in the area is Kirtland CDP which depicts a median income of $84,583 (about twice as large). Comparing median household income to the United States average of $62,843, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared to the state of New Mexico, median household income of $49,754, Upper Fruitland CDP is about 21.3% smaller.

Figure 5 has the Average number of hours worked in a typical work week during the year, it has a Avg Hours Worked of 39.4 which is the second most of all the places in the local area. The place with the highest average hours in the area is Kirtland CDP which depicts an average hours of 39.9 ( only slightly larger). Dividing median annual worker earnings by the average number of hours worked in a year in Figure 6 shows that it has a Avg Hrly Earnings of $15.60 which is the second smallest in order of average hourly earnings of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest average hourly earnings in the area is Kirtland CDP which shows an average hourly earnings of $38.73 (approximately 2.5 times bigger). Comparing average hourly earnings to the United States average of $24.31, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared to the state of New Mexico, average hourly earnings of $20.83, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 7 examines the number of self employed people in the Upper Fruitland CDP metro area based on the number of people who reported any self employment income. Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has a Self Employed of 7.0% which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest percentage of people self employed in the area is Nenahnezad CDP which indicates a percentage self employed of 12.1% (73.9% larger).

Turning our attention to Figure 8, the median household income by age group, has the percentage of median income-under 25 years less than most other places in the metropolitan area at $33,750 of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the metropolitan area when ranked by median income-25 to 44 years at $51,875 of the total. Third, it has less than most other places in the local area in order of median income-45 to 64 years at $30,781 of the total.

The next chart (Figure 11) shows the percentage of households that had retirement income over the last 12 months and it has a With Retirement Income of 15.7% which is the second smallest in order of households with retirement income of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest households with retirement income in the area is Nenahnezad CDP which depicts a households with retirement income of 29.3% (about twice as large).

In the next chart, Figure 12, the median family income is shown for families broken down by racial group and has the percentage of black family income in the mid point range of other places in the surrounding region at $49,500 of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of hawaiian family income at $23,542 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Farmington with $52,979.

Figure 13 shows the cost of living and other consumer spending categories for a variety of cost components from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Upper Fruitland CDP indicates it has the hightest cost of 101.8 for the cost of grocery items group.

Upper Fruitland CDP New Mexico Labor Force Charts

The next two charts look at very recent, monthly trended employment related performance using data estimated by economists at the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The BLS tracks unemployment statistics for a large number of areas throughout the country on a month to month basis. However, not every location in the U.S. is tracked by the BLS so the chart will only show the closest location available (which may be the same location.) Figure 14 shows the monthly unemployment rate for the area as well as a comparison to the overall national economy measure for the United States. Note that in March to April 2020, the Covid 19 recession or great recession occurred and affects this metric. . It depicts that from February 2010 to before the disasterous Covid-19 virus Pandemic the monthly unemployment rate went from 8.0% to 5.5% in February 2020. This represents a decrease in the monthly unemployment rate of 31.2%. Since that time, the monthly unemployment rate has gone to 9.0% This represents an increase in the monthly unemployment rate of 63.6%. In Figure 15 the monthly labor force participation which are people actively looking for work are also defined as unemployed but do not include people who have given up looking for work. . It depicts that from February 2010 to before the disasterous Covid-19 virus Pandemic the monthly labor force participation went from 20,471 to 19,945 in February 2020. This represents a decrease in the monthly labor force participation of 2.6%. Since that time, the monthly labor force participation has gone to 19,393 This represents a decrease in the monthly labor force participation of 2.8%.

The next two charts look at the annual unemployment rate/eligible for unemployment benefits and is based on the American Community survey. Figure 16 shows Upper Fruitland CDP shows it has a Unemployment Rate of 8.2% which is the third most unemployment rate of all other places in the greater Upper Fruitland CDP region. The place with the highest unemployment rate in the area is Nenahnezad CDP which shows a rate of 10.1% (23.1% larger). Figure 17 shows the labor force participation using the estimated percentage of people either working or actively looking for work. Upper Fruitland CDP shows it has a Labor Force Participation of 52.6% which is less than most other places in the area.

The percentage of full-time workers are compared to the number of part-time workers in Figure 19. Upper Fruitland CDP shows full time employees approximately 4.6 times bigger as the part time employees.

The next employment related data item is shown in Figure 21 which is the percentage of families with only a single earner in the greater Upper Fruitland CDP area. Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has a Single Earner Families of 30.5% which is in the mid range of other places in the metro area. The place with the highest families with a single earner in the area is Napi Headquarters CDP which shows a single earners rate of 60.4% (about twice as large). The percentage of families with no one working is depicted in Figure 22. Upper Fruitland CDP shows it has a Families with No One Working of 42.2% which is the second most families with no one working of all the places in the greater Upper Fruitland CDP region. The place with the highest families with no one working in the area is Nenahnezad CDP which depicts a families with no worker of 46.2% (9.5% larger).

Upper Fruitland CDP New Mexico Poverty Charts

The next section details economy analysis about poverty for residents of the Upper Fruitland CDP community. This performance can be enhanced by government programs such as economic opportunity zone to influence manufacturing, job growth, economic opportunity an hopefully lead to economic recovery after the recent Covid 19 recession. In Figure 23 the total number of people earning less than the poverty level are shown. Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has a Total In Poverty of 315 which is the third most total people earning less than the poverty level of all other places in the greater Upper Fruitland CDP region. The place with the highest total people earning less than the poverty level in the area is Farmington which shows a total people earning less than the poverty level of 7,613 ( markedly bigger).

In Figure 24 the percentage of people earning less than the poverty level is shown and compared across the group of places. Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has a Percent of Population In Poverty of 18.7% which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest percent of people earning less than the poverty level in the area is Ojo Amarillo CDP which shows a percent of people in poverty of 47.9% (approximately 2.6 times bigger).

In Figure 25 people who are in poverty are broken out by age group. Upper Fruitland CDP has the largest proportion of person in poverty 35 to 54 years at 17% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of person in poverty 55 to 64 years at 12% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Kirtland CDP with 100%.

The next chart, Figure 26, shows the percentage of people in poverty by racial group. Upper Fruitland CDP has the percentage of black poverty rate the second smallest in terms of white poverty rate of all the other places in the area at 18% of the total.

Figure 27 shows key poverty statistics for groups based on marriage status. Upper Fruitland CDP has the percentage of married with children and in poverty the second smallest when sorted by married with children and in poverty of all the other places in the local area at 30% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by married with children and in poverty of all the other places in the local area in terms of unmarried with children and in poverty at 30% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of unmarried female with children and in poverty at 31% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next chart looks at the percentage of people in poverty based on their education level in Figure 28 marriage status. Upper Fruitland CDP has the percentage of less than highschool in poverty less than most other places in the metropolitan area at 15% of the total. Figure 29 looks at only those people who make less than the poverty level of income and breaks down there employment status. Upper Fruitland CDP has one of the largest proportions of people who are in poverty and unemployed at 27.0% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Waterflow CDP with 37.3%. Additionally, Figure 30 looks at the percentage of people who receive some form of public assistance including general assistance, temporary assistance or food stamps (i.e. SNAP.) Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has a Public Assistance Percent of 21.1% which is in the mid range of other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest households with public assistance in the area is Napi Headquarters CDP which shows a households with public assistance of 42.5% (about twice as large).

Figure 31 shows the "Gini Index of Income Inequality" with a range from zero (perfect equality) to one (perfect inequality). Upper Fruitland CDP shows it has a Gini Index of 46.2% which is the second most of all the places in the surrounding region.

Upper Fruitland CDP New Mexico Work Commute Charts

In Figure 35 is shown a frequency distribution of the time that people leave for work. Upper Fruitland CDP has the largest proportion of people who leave for work between 12noon to 4pm at 16% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next graph in Figure 36 shows the average number of minutes that it takes for people to commute to work. Upper Fruitland CDP has the percentage of people with commute time between 10 to 14 minutes less than most other places in the area at 11% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of people with commute time between 15 to 19 minutes at 32% of the total and is ranked #1.

The average commute time is shown in Figure 37. Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has a Avg Commute Time of 23 which is the third most average commute time of all other places in the greater Upper Fruitland CDP region. Figure 38 shows the difference between male versus female commuting time. Upper Fruitland CDP depicts average commute time in minutes for men 19.1% larger as the average commute time in minutes for women. Figure 40 shows the total number of vehicles available for transportation and Upper Fruitland CDP has the percentage of no vehicle available in the center range of other places in the greater region at 14% of the total. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the area when sorted by 1 vehicle available at 29% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of 2 vehicles available at 31% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Ojo Amarillo CDP with 31%. Also, it has the largest proportion of 4 vehicles available at 12% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 41 shows the percentage of people who both work and live in the same city (town or place.) Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has a Work in city or place where live of 6% which is the third most people who both work and live in the same city of all other places in the greater Upper Fruitland CDP region. The place with the highest people who both work and live in the same city in the area is Farmington which depicts a people who both work and live in the same city of 71% ( substantially bigger). Comparing people who both work and live in the same city to the United States average of 42%, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately an eigth the size. Also, in comparison with the state of New Mexico, people who both work and live in the same city of 62%, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately a tenth the size.

Upper Fruitland CDP New Mexico Jobs Charts

The next to charts break out the median earnings for major job categories for men and women. Figure 46 shows the median earnings of men for the job categories. Upper Fruitland CDP depicts it has the hightest median earnings of $83,438 for the management, business, and financial occupations category. Similarly, Figure 47 shows the median earnings of women for the job categories and Upper Fruitland CDP indicates it has the hightest median earnings of $35,833 for the earnings-education, legal, community service, arts, media occupations grouping. The table in Figure 48, shows Upper Fruitland CDP employment data in terms of job categories and salary data.

Upper Fruitland CDP New Mexico Self Employment Charts

In Figure 51 the average annual self employment/entrepreneur income is shown. Upper Fruitland CDP shows it has a Self Employment Income of $28,897 which is the second most of all the places in the greater region. The place with the highest average annual self employment income in the area is Nenahnezad CDP which shows an average annual self employment income of $34,053 (17.8% larger). Comparing average annual self employment income to the United States average of $39,154, Upper Fruitland CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, in contrast to the state of New Mexico, average annual self employment income of $31,664, Upper Fruitland CDP is about 9.6% smaller.

Figure 52 shows the difference between the number of self employed men and self employed women (i.e. entrepreneurs.) Upper Fruitland CDP depicts total number of self-employed men about twice as large as the total number of self-employed women.