Johnson Lane CDP Nevada Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Johnson Lane CDP Nevada housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Johnson Lane CDP shows it has a Housing Units of 2,733 which is the second most housing units of all the places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Johnson Lane CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Johnson Lane CDP depicts it has a Housing Density of 125.0 which is in the center range of other places in the metro area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Minden CDP which depicts a density of 351.1 (approximately 2.8 times bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, Johnson Lane CDP is approximately 3.2 times bigger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Nevada, housing density of 11.6, Johnson Lane CDP is very much bigger.

In Figure 4, Johnson Lane CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Johnson Lane CDP depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of 3.4% which is in the mid range of other places in the local area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Indian Hills CDP which depicts a housing units of 10.1% (approximately 3.0 times bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, Johnson Lane CDP is approximately half the size. Also, measured against the state of Nevada, change in the housing units of 8.2%, Johnson Lane CDP is approximately half the size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Johnson Lane CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 6.3% which is the second smallest when ranked by renter percent of all the other places in the local area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 93.7% which is the second most of all the places in the metro area.

Johnson Lane CDP Nevada Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Johnson Lane CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Johnson Lane CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value of $530,000 which is in the intermediate range of other places in the local area. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Genoa CDP which depicts a home price of $908,500 (71.4% larger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Johnson Lane CDP Nevada metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Johnson Lane CDP depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $1,686 which is the second most of all the places in the area. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Fish Springs CDP which shows a rental rates of $1,750 (only about 3.8% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,163, Johnson Lane CDP is 45.0% larger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Nevada, rental rates of $1,238, Johnson Lane CDP is 36.2% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Johnson Lane CDP has the largest proportion of home price worth between $300,000 to $400,000 at 30% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 East Valley CDP (13%), and #1 Genoa CDP (18%) are larger. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 East Valley CDP (13%), and #1 Genoa CDP (18%) are larger.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Johnson Lane CDP shows it has a Median Owner Cost of $1,643 which is the second most median ownership cost of all the places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Johnson Lane CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 22% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Johnson Lane CDP shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 735% which is in the mid range of other places in the local area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Johnson Lane CDP shows it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $2,135 which is the third most median housing cost of all other places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $592 which is in the middle range of other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Johnson Lane CDP has the percentage of owner cost less than $300 less than most other places in the surrounding region at 3% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $3,500 and $4,000 at 4% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 East Valley CDP (13%), and #1 Genoa CDP (17%) are larger.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Johnson Lane CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 24% which is at the top of all other places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region. Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Johnson Lane CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 9% which is the third most cost as a percent of household income of all other places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Genoa CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 15% (62.2% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Johnson Lane CDP has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct in the mid range of other places in the area at 20% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the local area in order of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 7% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 26% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 24% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Minden CDP with 32%.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Johnson Lane CDP has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $2,688 which is in the mid range of other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Genoa CDP which shows a taxes paid of $5,344 (about twice as large). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,690, Johnson Lane CDP is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of Nevada, median real estate taxes paid of $1,736, Johnson Lane CDP is 54.8% larger.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Johnson Lane CDP Nevada has one of the largest proportions of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 24% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Carson City (31%), and #1 East Valley CDP (61%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 53% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fish Springs CDP with 95%.

Johnson Lane CDP Nevada Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Johnson Lane CDP has one of the largest proportions of With mortgage at 60% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Indian Hills CDP with 67%. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by With Mortgage of all the other places in the area as measured by With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 31% of the total.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Johnson Lane CDP has the percentage of houses with mortgages the second smallest as measured by houses with a mortgage of all the other places in the local area at 31% of the total.

Johnson Lane CDP Nevada Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 2.7 which is less than most other places in the area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Carson City which depicts a family members per housing unit of 3.1 (16.1% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Johnson Lane CDP is about 22.6% smaller. Also, in comparison with the state of Nevada, family members per housing unit of 3.4, Johnson Lane CDP is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 6.2 which is in the mid range of other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Fish Springs CDP which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 6.6 (6.5% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1996 which is the most of all places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region.

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2010 to 2019 at 31% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Fish Springs CDP (31%), and #1 Genoa CDP (37%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 35% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being East Valley CDP with 41%.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units in the mid point range of other places in the greater region at 168 of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2014 or later at $663,200 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $647,000 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Genoa CDP ($917,600), and #1 East Valley CDP ($936,300) are larger. Third, it has in the center range of other places in the metro area when ranked by value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $472,000 of the total. Also, it has in the intermediate range of other places in the local area in terms of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $462,000 of the total. In addition, it has in the mid range of other places in the metropolitan area as measured by value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $460,800 of the total.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the percentage of occupied housing units less than most other places in the metro area at 3% of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Johnson Lane CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.4 which is the third most homeowner household size of all other places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Fish Springs CDP which indicates a homeowner household size of 2.5 (only about 2.5% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Johnson Lane CDP shows it has a Renter-Household Size of 1.9 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Minden CDP which shows a renter household sizes of 2.7 (41.7% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2015 to 2018 at 20% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 4% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Johnson Lane CDP has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2019 or later at 54% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Indian Hills CDP with 58%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of renters moved in 2015 to 2018 at 7% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 27% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fish Springs CDP with 76%.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2010 which is the second most median year that a home owner moved in of all the places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Johnson Lane CDP shows it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2017 which is the most of all places in the greater Johnson Lane CDP region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the smallest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 5% of the total.