King township Missouri Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of King township Missouri housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. King township indicates it has a housing units of 109 which is the second smallest when sorted by housing units of all the other places in the metro area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the King township housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) King township shows it has a housing density of 2.4 which is the smallest when sorted by housing density of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Grandin which shows a density of 304.7 ( very much bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, King township is only about 6.2% the size. Also, in contrast to the state of Missouri, housing density of 40.4, King township is only about 5.9% the size.

In Figure 4, King township area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. King township shows it has a change in the housing units of 81.7% which is the most of all places in the greater King township region. Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, King township is substantially bigger. Also, compared to the state of Missouri, change in the housing units of 2.3%, King township is substantially bigger. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 100.0% which is more than all other places in the greater King township region.

King township Missouri Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average King township home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. King township depicts it has a median home price of $73,400 which is the second most of all the places in the metro area. The city with the highest median home price in the area is Van Buren which shows a home price of $105,000 (43.1% larger).

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. King township has the largest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 87% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 13% of the total. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the King township metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 37% which is the most of all places in the greater King township region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. King township has the largest proportion of owner cost less than $300 at 44% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 56% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. King township has the largest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 44% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 56% of the total and is ranked #1.

King township Missouri Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. King township has the percentage of no mortgage less than most other places in the metropolitan area at 44% of the total.

King township Missouri Home Characteristics Charts

The next section of charts provide a wide range of metrics related to the housing market physical characteristics which can be useful for a real estate investor. Figure 27 looks at the number of people living in a typical house in the real estate market starting with the average household size (families and non families). King township has the smallest proportion of housing density at 1.5 of the total. Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 2.0 which is the smallest when sorted by family members per housing unit of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Grandin which depicts a family members per housing unit of 4.0 (about twice as large). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, King township is approximately half the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Missouri, family members per housing unit of 3.1, King township is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 4.1 which is the smallest as measured by average number of rooms in a house of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Hunter CDP which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 6.3 (53.7% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1956 which is the smallest in terms of year built of all the other places in the surrounding region. The city with the highest year built in the area is Hunter CDP which shows a year built of 1998 ( only slightly larger).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 23% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Grandin with 26%. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the metropolitan area as measured by homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 6% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 36% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units less than most other places in the surrounding region at 45 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of one unit detached at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the smallest proportion of occupied housing units at 41% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of vacant housing units at 59% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for King township residents. it has a homeowner household size of 1.5 which is the smallest when sorted by homeowner household size of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Hunter CDP which shows a homeowner household size of 2.9 (about twice as large). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 71% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2007 which is the second most median year that a home owner moved in of all the places in the greater King township region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 69% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes using wood at 31% of the total and is ranked #1.