Jordan township-Ripley County Missouri Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Jordan township-Ripley County Missouri housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Jordan township-Ripley County depicts it has a housing units of 450 which is the second most of all the places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Jordan township-Ripley County housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Jordan township-Ripley County shows it has a housing density of 5.8 which is the smallest in order of housing density of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Doniphan which shows a density of 767.2 ( considerably bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Jordan township-Ripley County is approximately a sixth the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Missouri, housing density of 40.4, Jordan township-Ripley County is approximately a sixth the size.

In Figure 4, Jordan township-Ripley County area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Jordan township-Ripley County shows it has a change in the housing units of -0.9% which is the second smallest when sorted by change in the housing units of all the other places in the greater region. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Fairdealing CDP which depicts a housing units of 38.4% ( substantially bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Jordan township-Ripley County is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of Missouri, change in the housing units of 2.3%, Jordan township-Ripley County is about the same size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Jordan township-Ripley County shows it has a renter percent of 2.1% which is the second smallest as measured by renter percent of all the other places in the surrounding region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 97.9% which is the second most owner percent of all the places in the greater Jordan township-Ripley County region.

Jordan township-Ripley County Missouri Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Jordan township-Ripley County home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Jordan township-Ripley County depicts it has a median home price of $105,700 which is the second most median home prices of all the places in the greater Jordan township-Ripley County region. The city with the highest median home price in the area is Fairdealing CDP which shows a home price of $114,500 (8.3% larger).

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Jordan township-Ripley County has one of the largest proportions of home price worth less than $50,000 at 33% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Oxly CDP (45%), and #1 Hunter CDP (48%) are larger. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the greater region in terms of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 13% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 24% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $500,000 to $750,000 at 2% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Jordan township-Ripley County depicts it has a median ownership cost of $352 which is the second smallest when sorted by median ownership cost of all the other places in the metro area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Jordan township-Ripley County metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 14% which is less than most other places in the metro area. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Jordan township-Ripley County depicts it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 315% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Jordan township-Ripley County region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Jordan township-Ripley County shows it has a median housing cost of $1,259 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Jordan township-Ripley County region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $282 which is in the mid range of other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Jordan township-Ripley County has the largest proportion of owner cost less than $300 at 40% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 39% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Ellsinore with 51%. Third, it has the second smallest in order of owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the greater region when sorted by owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 9% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $3,000 and $3,500 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Jordan township-Ripley County shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 25% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Jordan township-Ripley County region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Oxly CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 51% (about twice as large). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Jordan township-Ripley County depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 11% which is the second smallest in order of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the greater region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Grandin which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 21% (about twice as large).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Jordan township-Ripley County has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is over 50pct at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Jordan township-Ripley County has the largest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 39% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by housing cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area when sorted by housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 8% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of housing cost over $3,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $507 which is in the mid range of other places in the greater region. The city with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Fairdealing CDP which shows a taxes paid of $676 (33.3% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Jordan township-Ripley County is approximately a fifth the size. Also, measured against the state of Missouri, median real estate taxes paid of $1,470, Jordan township-Ripley County is approximately a third the size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Jordan township-Ripley County Missouri. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Jordan township-Ripley County has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Jordan township-Ripley County Missouri has the largest proportion of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Jordan township-Ripley County Missouri Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Jordan township-Ripley County has the smallest proportion of with mortgage at 33% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of no 2nd mortgage and no heloc at 33% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of no mortgage at 67% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Jordan township-Ripley County has the smallest proportion of houses with mortgages at 33% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of houses without mortgages at 67% of the total and is ranked #1.

Jordan township-Ripley County Missouri Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 3.5 which is in the center range of other places in the metro area. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Grandin which depicts a family members per housing unit of 4.0 (13.9% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Jordan township-Ripley County is 6.5% larger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Missouri, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Jordan township-Ripley County is 12.8% larger.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 5.3 which is the third most average number of rooms in a house of all other places in the greater Jordan township-Ripley County region. The city with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Hunter CDP which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 6.3 (18.9% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1979 which is in the middle range of other places in the surrounding region. The city with the highest year built in the area is Hunter CDP which shows a year built of 1998 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 5% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Fairdealing CDP with 12%. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 24% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunter CDP with 41%. Third, it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the local area in order of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 6% of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 30% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Oxly CDP with 51%. In addition, it has less than most other places in the surrounding region when ranked by homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 1% of the total. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 18% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Ellsinore with 18%.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has one of the largest proportions of owner housing units at 382 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Doniphan with 485. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of owner-occupied housing units of all the other places in the local area when sorted by renter housing units at 8 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of mobile home at 23% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Oxly CDP with 50%.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $109,500 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $242,500 of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. it has the largest proportion of occupied housing units at 87% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of vacant housing units at 13% of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Jordan township-Ripley County residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.9 which is the second most of all the places in the metro area. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Hunter CDP which shows a homeowner household size of 2.9 ( only slightly larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 in the mid range of other places in the greater region at 7% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 49% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunter CDP with 54%. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 30% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunter CDP with 46%. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Jordan township-Ripley County has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2001 which is less than most other places in the greater region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 41% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Hunter CDP with 48%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home using electricity at 31% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes using wood at 26% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Oxly CDP with 29%.