Imperial CDP Missouri Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Imperial CDP Missouri housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Imperial CDP depicts it has a housing units of 1,821 which is in the center range of other places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Imperial CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Imperial CDP shows it has a housing density of 346.6 which is less than most other places in the greater region. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Arnold which shows a density of 750.9 (about twice as large). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Imperial CDP is quite a bit bigger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Missouri, housing density of 40.4, Imperial CDP is very much bigger.

In Figure 4, Imperial CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Imperial CDP depicts it has a change in the housing units of -2.7% which is the second smallest as measured by change in the housing units of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Horine CDP which shows a housing units of 12.9% (approximately 4.8 times bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Imperial CDP is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of Missouri, change in the housing units of 2.3%, Imperial CDP is 15.2% larger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Imperial CDP depicts it has a renter percent of 11.7% which is less than most other places in the local area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 88.3% which is the third most of all other places in the greater region.

Imperial CDP Missouri Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Imperial CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Imperial CDP shows it has a median home price of $161,800 which is the highest of all places in the greater Imperial CDP region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Imperial CDP Missouri metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Imperial CDP depicts it has a rental rates of $1,043 which is the largest of all places in the greater Imperial CDP region. Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Imperial CDP is only slightly larger. Also, measured against the state of Missouri, rental rates of $809, Imperial CDP is 28.9% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Imperial CDP has the percentage of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 in the mid range of other places in the metropolitan area at 9% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of home price worth $2,000,000 or more at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Imperial CDP depicts it has a median ownership cost of $1,017 which is in the mid point range of other places in the metro area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Imperial CDP metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 17% which is in the middle range of other places in the local area. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Imperial CDP depicts it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 341% which is the second most of all the places in the metropolitan area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Imperial CDP depicts it has a median housing cost of $1,235 which is in the mid range of other places in the area. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $452 which is the third most of all other places in the metro area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Imperial CDP has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 14% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Pevely with 15%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 12% of the total.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Imperial CDP shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 20% which is the third most cost as a percent of household income of all other places in the greater Imperial CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Kimmswick which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 33% (64.7% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Imperial CDP indicates it has a cost as a percent of household income of 12% which is the third most cost as a percent of household income of all other places in the greater Imperial CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Pevely which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 13% (7.6% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Imperial CDP has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct the second smallest when sorted by rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the metro area at 21% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 38% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has in the middle range of other places in the greater region as measured by rent as a percent of income is between 30pct to 40pct at 7% of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 18% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Barnhart CDP with 28%. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is over 50pct at 13% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Arnold (16%), and #1 Pevely (16%) are larger.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Imperial CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 13% of the total.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $1,362 which is in the middle range of other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Valmeyer which depicts a taxes paid of $3,251 (approximately 2.4 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Imperial CDP is approximately half the size. Also, compared to the state of Missouri, median real estate taxes paid of $1,470, Imperial CDP is about 7.9% smaller.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Imperial CDP Missouri. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Imperial CDP has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Imperial CDP Missouri has one of the largest proportions of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 32% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Kimmswick (40%), and #1 Pevely (47%) are larger. Second, it has the second smallest in order of rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the greater region when ranked by rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 13% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 40% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Barnhart CDP with 46%. Also, it has the largest proportion of rent between $1,500 and $2,500 at 12% of the total and is ranked #1.

Imperial CDP Missouri Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Imperial CDP has the percentage of with mortgage less than most other places in the metro area at 64% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of no mortgage at 36% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Arnold (38%), and #1 Kimmswick (50%) are larger.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Imperial CDP has the percentage of houses with mortgages less than most other places in the metro area at 64% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of houses without mortgages at 36% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Arnold (38%), and #1 Kimmswick (50%) are larger.

Imperial CDP Missouri Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 3.0 which is the smallest as measured by family members per housing unit of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Horine CDP which shows a family members per housing unit of 4.2 (38.7% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Imperial CDP is about 10.5% smaller. Also, measured against the state of Missouri, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Imperial CDP is only about 4.4% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 5.8 which is in the mid range of other places in the greater region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Kimmswick which shows an average number of rooms in a house of 6.1 (only about 5.2% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1985 which is the third most of all other places in the local area. The place with the highest year built in the area is Valmeyer which shows a year built of 2000 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the percentage of homes built between 2010 to 2013 in the mid point range of other places in the greater region at 1% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 24% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Valmeyer with 43%. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 22% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Barnhart CDP with 25%. Also, it has in the mid range of other places in the metropolitan area when ranked by homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 6% of the total. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 4% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Kimmswick with 5%. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 5% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Barnhart CDP (6%), and #1 Kimmswick (51%) are larger.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has one of the largest proportions of owner housing units at 1,437 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Barnhart CDP (1,960), and #1 Arnold (6,047) are larger. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the metro area when sorted by renter housing units at 190 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of mobile home at 11% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Pevely with 21%.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $210,400 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Arnold with $273,500. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $168,900 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Barnhart CDP ($173,400), and #1 Arnold ($191,900) are larger. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $140,600 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Arnold with $152,100. Also, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $151,400 of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $119,400 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Arnold ($133,700), and #1 Barnhart CDP ($138,700) are larger. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $118,500 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Kimmswick ($120,800), and #1 Arnold ($123,300) are larger. Next it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $210,400 of the total and is ranked #1. Additionally, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $122,900 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Kimmswick ($212,500), and #1 Barnhart CDP ($348,700) are larger.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Imperial CDP residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.5 which is the second smallest in order of homeowner household size of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Horine CDP which depicts a homeowner household size of 3.6 (45.4% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Imperial CDP shows it has a renter household size of 3.5 which is the second most renter household sizes of all the places in the greater Imperial CDP region. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Kimmswick which shows a renter household sizes of 3.8 (8.9% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2015 to 2016 the second smallest in terms of owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the metro area at 4% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the greater region in terms of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 15% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Imperial CDP has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 24% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Pevely with 24%. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by renters moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area when sorted by renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 16% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 54% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Horine CDP with 100%. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 1990 to 1999 at 7% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Valmeyer with 7%.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2002 which is in the middle range of other places in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Imperial CDP depicts it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2009 which is less than most other places in the local area.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the percentage of homes using natural gas less than most other places in the area at 27% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home using electricity at 62% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Pevely (62%), and #1 Horine CDP (73%) are larger.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Imperial CDP housing department, Missouri department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Imperial CDP shows it has a total people living in group quarters of 7 which is in the mid point range of other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Imperial CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Imperial CDP has the largest proportion of number of people 18 years of age and older living in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.