Imperial CDP Missouri Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Imperial CDP Missouri housing market data taken from the most recent 2020 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Imperial CDP depicts it has a Housing Units of 1,804 which is in the center range of other places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Imperial CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Imperial CDP shows it has a Housing Density of 343.3 which is less than most other places in the area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Arnold which depicts a density of 756.4 (approximately 2.2 times bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.9, Imperial CDP is markedly bigger. Also, in contrast to the state of Missouri, housing density of 40.6, Imperial CDP is considerably bigger.

In Figure 4, Imperial CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Imperial CDP depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of -3.6% which is the second smallest as measured by change in the housing units of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Barnhart CDP which shows a housing units of 7.8% (about twice as large). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 5.7%, Imperial CDP is about the same size. Also, compared with the state of Missouri, change in the housing units of 2.9%, Imperial CDP is 25.1% larger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Imperial CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 15.0% which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 85.0% which is the third most of all other places in the area.

Imperial CDP Missouri Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Imperial CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Imperial CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value of $162,300 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater Imperial CDP region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Imperial CDP Missouri metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Imperial CDP depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $944 which is in the mid point range of other places in the metro area. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Barnhart CDP which shows a rental rates of $1,040 (10.2% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,062, Imperial CDP is about 12.5% smaller. Also, measured against the state of Missouri, rental rates of $830, Imperial CDP is 13.7% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Imperial CDP has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 less than most other places in the local area at 7% of the total.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Imperial CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $943 which is the second smallest as measured by median ownership cost of all the other places in the local area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Imperial CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 16% which is the third most cost as a percent of household income of all other places in the greater Imperial CDP region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Imperial CDP shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 337% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Imperial CDP region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Imperial CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,210 which is in the center range of other places in the greater region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $443 which is less than most other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Imperial CDP has one of the largest proportions of owner cost less than $300 at 17% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Arnold (18%), and #1 Horine CDP (29%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 13% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Pevely with 13%.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Imperial CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 19% which is in the mid point range of other places in the greater region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Kimmswick which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 31% (58.5% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Imperial CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 11% which is in the mid range of other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Kimmswick which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 22% (about twice as large).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Imperial CDP has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct at 16% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 38% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 8% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Pevely (16%), and #1 Arnold (16%) are larger.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $1,414 which is less than most other places in the greater region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Valmeyer which depicts a taxes paid of $3,299 (approximately 2.3 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,471, Imperial CDP is approximately half the size. Also, compared with the state of Missouri, median real estate taxes paid of $1,526, Imperial CDP is about 7.9% smaller.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Imperial CDP Missouri has the percentage of rent less than 300 dollars in the mid range of other places in the metro area at 3% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 26% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Pevely with 39%. Third, it has in the mid point range of other places in the surrounding region as measured by rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 31% of the total. Also, it has in the mid range of other places in the local area in order of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 32% of the total.

Imperial CDP Missouri Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Imperial CDP has the largest proportion of with heloc at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by with mortgage of all the other places in the local area when sorted by both 2nd mortgage and heloc at 55% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of no 2nd mortgage and no heloc at 39% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Kimmswick with 45%.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Imperial CDP has one of the largest proportions of houses with mortgages at 39% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Kimmswick with 45%.

Imperial CDP Missouri Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.0 which is the second smallest as measured by family members per housing unit of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Horine CDP which depicts a family members per housing unit of 4.1 (34.9% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Imperial CDP is about 10.5% smaller. Also, in contrast to the state of Missouri, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Imperial CDP is only about 4.3% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 5.8 which is the third most average number of rooms in a house of all other places in the greater Imperial CDP region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Barnhart CDP which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 6.2 (6.9% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1984 which is the third most year built of all other places in the greater Imperial CDP region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Valmeyer which shows a year built of 1999 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the percentage of homes built between 2010 to 2013 in the mid range of other places in the surrounding region at 11% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 22% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Valmeyer with 44%. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 25% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Barnhart CDP with 30%. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 5% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Pevely (5%), and #1 Kimmswick (48%) are larger.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has one of the largest proportions of owner housing units at 247 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Pevely (894), and #1 Arnold (2,208) are larger.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of 50 or more units at 11% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Pevely with 18%.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $223,400 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Arnold with $276,700. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $176,700 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Arnold with $199,400. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $157,300 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Arnold with $158,900. Also, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $150,900 of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $118,200 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Pevely ($120,200), and #1 Arnold ($137,900) are larger. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $120,100 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Arnold with $122,700. Next it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $151,000 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Kimmswick with $210,000.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Imperial CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.5 which is the second smallest as measured by homeowner household size of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Horine CDP which depicts a homeowner household size of 3.7 (44.5% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Imperial CDP shows it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.8 which is the second most renter household sizes of all the places in the greater Imperial CDP region. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Barnhart CDP which depicts a renter household sizes of 3.3 (15.9% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2017 or later the second smallest as measured by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the metropolitan area at 5% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area when ranked by owners moved in 2015 to 2016 at 14% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 38% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Horine CDP (42%), and #1 Valmeyer (50%) are larger. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Imperial CDP has the percentage of renters moved in 2017 or later less than most other places in the surrounding region at 27% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by renters moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the metro area when sorted by renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 19% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 44% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2001 which is less than most other places in the greater region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Imperial CDP depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2012 which is less than most other places in the greater region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 66% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Horine CDP with 79%. Second, it has the largest proportion of home using electricity at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes using solar energy at 0% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Horine CDP with 11%.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Imperial CDP housing department, Missouri department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Imperial CDP depicts it has a Total In Group Quarters of 6 which is in the center range of other places in the local area.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Imperial CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Imperial CDP has the largest proportion of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.