Hunter Missouri Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of housing data mostly taking from the most recent 2017 American Community Survey. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city in the local area shown. Hunter shows it has 57 housing units which is the 4th smallest housing units of all the other places in the area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the area as measured by houses per square land mile and it has 15.7 housing density which is the 4th in housing density out of 10 total in the area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Ellsinore with a density of 549.8 is substantially bigger. Comparing housing density to the United States average of 37.9, Hunter measures approximately half the size. Also, compared with the state of Missouri, housing density of 39.9, Hunter measures approximately half the size.

The next Figure 4 charge shows the change in housing units and shows Hunter indicates it has -25.0% change in the housing units which is the 4th smallest change in the housing units of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Ellsinore with a housing units of 23.6% measures about the same size. Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 1.8%, Hunter compares as considerably bigger. Also, compared with the state of Missouri, change in the housing units of 1.0%, Hunter measures substantially bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of renter households to total households. Hunter points out it has 12.5% Renter Percent which is the 6th in Renter Percent out of 10 total in the area. Figure 6 shows the number of owner housing units and it has 87.5% Owner Percent which is the 2nd most of all the places in the area.

Hunter Missouri Home Cost Charts

Figure 9 is a frequency distribution that shows home values. Hunter has the largest proportion of home values worth less than $50,000 at 43% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of home values worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 43% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs are shown in Figure 10 and includes costs associated with mortgage, utilities, insurance, etc. Hunter indicates it has $842 median ownership cost which is the most of all placesin the area. Figure 11 shows the median owner cost as a percent of total household income and it has 14% cost as a percent of household income which is the 4th smallest cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for property owners. This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Hunter has the largest proportion of Owner Cost Between $700 and $1,000 at 86% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 19 looks at the number of households rent as a percent of household income and shows that Hunter has the largest proportion of Rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows housing costs for owners or renters where costs for renters include: rent, utilities (if paid), insurance, etc. Hunter has the largest proportion of Housing Cost Between $700 and $1,000 at 75% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows real estate taxes paid for each city in the local area and it has $283 median real estate taxes paid which is the 4th smallest median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Carter township with a taxes paid of $807 measures approximately 2.9 times bigger. Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,197, Hunter compares as approximately an eigth the size. Also, compared with the state of Missouri, median real estate taxes paid of $1,408, Hunter is approximately a fifth the size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities by showing rents who pay versus renters who have utilities included in rent. Hunter has the largest proportion of Pay Extra for Utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the distribution of rental rates for area. Hunter Missouri has the largest proportion of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Hunter Missouri Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Hunter has the largest proportion of With Mortgage at 86% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of No 2nd Mortgage and no HELOC at 86% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Hunter has the largest proportion of Houses with a Mortgage at 86% of the total and is ranked #1.

Hunter Missouri Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has 2.5 family members per housing unit which is the 4th smallest family members per housing unit of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Van Buren with a size of 3.7 is 51.8% larger. Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Hunter is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared with the state of Missouri, family members per housing unit of 3.2, Hunter is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each city in the area. Hunter indicates it has 4.3 average number of rooms in a house which is the 4th smallest average number of rooms in a house of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Jordan township with an average number of rooms in a house of 5.7 is 32.6% larger. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each city, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another. Hunter shows it has 1992 year built which is more than all other placesin the area.

Figure 31 looks at the distribution housing units by date built in this area. Hunter Missouri has the largest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 65% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 21% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. Hunter has the largest proportion of Mobile home at 32% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied to vacant housing units. Hunter has the largest proportion of Vacant Housing Units at 44% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the household size of homeowners and renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners. Hunter illustrates it has 1.8 homeowner household size which is the 4th smallest homeowner household size of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Johnson township with a size of 2.8 measures 60.0% larger.

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters Hunter illustrates it has 3.0 renter household size which is ranked #1 of all placesin the area. Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into the area. Hunter has the largest proportion of Owners Moved in 1990 to 1999 at 76% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who own homes moved into the area. Hunter has the largest proportion of Renters Moved in 2000 to 2009 at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that a home owner moved into their home. Hunter shows it has 1999 median year that a home owner moved in which is the 4th smallest median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the area.

Figure 42 shows a frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used in a home. Hunter has the largest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or LP gas at 50% of the total and is ranked #1.