White Earth CDP Minnesota Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of White Earth CDP Minnesota housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. White Earth CDP shows it has a Housing Units of 294 which is the second most housing units of all the places in the greater White Earth CDP region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the White Earth CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) White Earth CDP depicts it has a Housing Density of 86.1 which is less than most other places in the area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Riverland CDP which shows a density of 479.0 ( substantially bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, White Earth CDP is about twice as large. Also, compared to the state of Minnesota, housing density of 31.1, White Earth CDP is approximately 2.8 times bigger.

In Figure 4, White Earth CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. White Earth CDP shows it has a Housing Unit Change of 25.1% which is the largest of all places in the greater White Earth CDP region. Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, White Earth CDP is approximately 3.4 times bigger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Minnesota, change in the housing units of 5.3%, White Earth CDP is approximately 4.8 times bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) White Earth CDP indicates it has a Renter Percent of 78.1% which is the second most renter percent of all the places in the greater White Earth CDP region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 21.9% which is the second smallest when sorted by owner percent of all the other places in the metro area.

White Earth CDP Minnesota Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average White Earth CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. White Earth CDP shows it has a Median Home Value of $63,300 which is the second smallest when sorted by median home price of all the other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Twin Lakes CDP which shows a home price of $189,200 (approximately 3.0 times bigger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the White Earth CDP Minnesota metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. White Earth CDP shows it has a Median Gross Rent of $229 which is the smallest when sorted by rental rates of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Callaway which depicts a rental rates of $746 (approximately 3.3 times bigger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,163, White Earth CDP is approximately a fifth the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Minnesota, rental rates of $1,081, White Earth CDP is approximately a fifth the size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. White Earth CDP has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 less than most other places in the local area at 33% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 11% of the total.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. White Earth CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $409 which is the second smallest as measured by median ownership cost of all the other places in the metro area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the White Earth CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 22% which is more than all other places in the greater White Earth CDP region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. White Earth CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 180% which is the third most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all other places in the greater White Earth CDP region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) White Earth CDP shows it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $775 which is the second smallest in terms of median housing cost of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $350 which is the second smallest in terms of median housing cost of all the other places in the metro area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. White Earth CDP has the largest proportion of owner cost less than $300 at 59% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest in terms of owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the metro area when ranked by owner cost between $300 and $500 at 15% of the total. Third, it has less than most other places in the metro area in terms of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 13% of the total. Also, it has in the center range of other places in the greater region as measured by owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 4% of the total.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) White Earth CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 29% which is the largest of all places in the greater White Earth CDP region. Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. White Earth CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 14% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater White Earth CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Callaway which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 17% (20.1% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) White Earth CDP has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct at 58% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Twin Lakes CDP with 100%. Second, it has the second smallest when ranked by rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the metro area as measured by rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 7% of the total. Third, it has less than most other places in the metro area in terms of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 5% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. White Earth CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 6% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 1% of the total.



Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in White Earth CDP Minnesota. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. White Earth CDP has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 44% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. White Earth CDP Minnesota has the percentage of rent less than 300 dollars the second smallest when ranked by rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the greater region at 16% of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the greater region as measured by rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 18% of the total. Third, it has the second smallest when sorted by rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the metropolitan area in order of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 2% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 2% of the total. In addition, it has the largest proportion of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 2% of the total and is ranked #1.

White Earth CDP Minnesota Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. White Earth CDP has the smallest proportion of With mortgage at 22% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 78% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. White Earth CDP has the largest proportion of houses with mortgages at 78% of the total and is ranked #1.

White Earth CDP Minnesota Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 4.5 which is the largest of all places in the greater White Earth CDP region. Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, White Earth CDP is 35.5% larger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Minnesota, family members per housing unit of 3.2, White Earth CDP is 40.9% larger.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 4.2 which is the smallest in order of average number of rooms in a house of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Waubun which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 5.9 (40.5% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1979 which is the third most year built of all other places in the greater White Earth CDP region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Riverland CDP which shows a year built of 2003 ( only slightly larger).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2010 to 2019 at 14% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Ogema (30%), and #1 Riverland CDP (69%) are larger. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 30% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 17% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 2% of the total. Furthermore, it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the local area when sorted by homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 1% of the total. Next it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the metro area when ranked by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 4% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has one of the largest proportions of owner housing units at 193 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Mahnomen with 194.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of 2 units at 16% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of 10 to 19 units at 14% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Riverland CDP with 36%.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 less than most other places in the local area at $69,300 of the total. Second, it has in the mid point range of other places in the metro area when ranked by value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $22,500 of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for White Earth CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.7 which is in the mid point range of other places in the area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Waubun which shows a homeowner household size of 3.1 (17.6% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. White Earth CDP depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.9 which is the third most of all other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Riverland CDP which shows a renter household sizes of 3.7 (27.0% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2019 or later the second smallest in terms of owners moved in 2019 or later of all the other places in the metropolitan area at 10% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 42% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. White Earth CDP has the percentage of renters moved in 2019 or later in the intermediate range of other places in the area at 31% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 1993 which is the second smallest in terms of median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the metropolitan area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. White Earth CDP indicates it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2017 which is the largest of all places in the local area.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the percentage of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas in the mid range of other places in the greater region at 32% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes using coal or coke at 6% of the total and is ranked #1.