Rushseba township Minnesota Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Rushseba township Minnesota housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Rushseba township depicts it has a housing units of 327 which is the second smallest as measured by housing units of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Rushseba township housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Rushseba township shows it has a housing density of 10.9 which is the smallest in order of housing density of all the other places in the greater region. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Braham which depicts a density of 505.3 ( considerably bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Rushseba township is approximately a third the size. Also, compared to the state of Minnesota, housing density of 30.4, Rushseba township is approximately a third the size.

In Figure 4, Rushseba township area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Rushseba township depicts it has a change in the housing units of -3.3% which is the smallest in order of change in the housing units of all the other places in the area. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Pine City which shows a housing units of 8.2% (approximately 2.5 times bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Rushseba township is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of Minnesota, change in the housing units of 3.1%, Rushseba township is only about 4.3% larger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Rushseba township shows it has a renter percent of 5.2% which is the smallest in order of renter percent of all the other places in the metro area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 94.8% which is the largest of all places in the greater Rushseba township region.

Rushseba township Minnesota Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Rushseba township home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Rushseba township shows it has a median home price of $211,200 which is the highest of all places in the greater region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Rushseba township Minnesota metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Rushseba township shows it has a rental rates of $775 which is in the middle range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest rental rates in the area is Rock Creek which shows a rental rates of $1,014 (30.8% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Rushseba township is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Minnesota, rental rates of $944, Rushseba township is about 21.8% smaller.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Rushseba township has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 the second smallest in order of home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 3% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 26% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Rock Creek (31%), and #1 Harris (34%) are larger. Also, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $300,000 to $400,000 at 17% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $400,000 to $500,000 at 9% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Rushseba township depicts it has a median ownership cost of $1,412 which is the largest of all places in the greater Rushseba township region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Rushseba township metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 21% which is the third most cost as a percent of household income of all other places in the greater Rushseba township region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Rushseba township shows it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 449% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Rushseba township region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Rushseba township shows it has a median housing cost of $1,664 which is more than all other places in the greater Rushseba township region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $473 which is in the center range of other places in the greater region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Rushseba township has one of the largest proportions of owner cost less than $300 at 4% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Stanchfield CDP with 22%. Second, it has less than most other places in the metropolitan area as measured by owner cost between $300 and $500 at 4% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 10% of the total. Also, it has less than most other places in the metro area when ranked by owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 9% of the total. In addition, it has the second smallest as measured by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area when sorted by owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 22% of the total. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 13% of the total and is ranked #1. Next it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1. Additionally, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $3,000 and $3,500 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. And then, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $3,500 and $4,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost over $4,000 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Rushseba township depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 27% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Rushseba township region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Stanchfield CDP which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 38% (40.4% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Rushseba township depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 12% which is the third most cost as a percent of household income of all other places in the greater Rushseba township region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Braham which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 14% (13.3% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Rushseba township has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct the second smallest when ranked by rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the greater region at 13% of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the area in order of rent as a percent of income is over 50pct at 13% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Rushseba township has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 12% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of housing cost over $3,000 at 5% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $2,385 which is more than all other places in the greater Rushseba township region. Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Rushseba township is about the same size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Minnesota, median real estate taxes paid of $2,388, Rushseba township is about the same size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Rushseba township Minnesota. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Rushseba township has the smallest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 53% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of utilities included in rent at 47% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Rushseba township Minnesota has one of the largest proportions of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 27% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Rush City with 46%.

Rushseba township Minnesota Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Rushseba township has the largest proportion of with mortgage at 77% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of 2nd mortgage or heloc-not both at 18% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Harris with 18%. Third, it has the largest proportion of 2nd mortgage at 7% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of with heloc at 11% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Harris with 11%. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of no mortgage at 23% of the total.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Rushseba township has the largest proportion of houses with mortgages at 77% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of houses without mortgages at 23% of the total.

Rushseba township Minnesota Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 3.0 which is less than most other places in the local area. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Rock Creek which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.4 (12.7% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Rushseba township is about 9.4% smaller. Also, in contrast to the state of Minnesota, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Rushseba township is only about 3.5% smaller.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 6.6 which is the highest of all places in the greater Rushseba township region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1978 which is in the center range of other places in the greater region. The city with the highest year built in the area is Rock Creek which shows a year built of 1989 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 20% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Braham with 23%. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the area as measured by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 3% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 22% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Harris (31%), and #1 Stanchfield CDP (46%) are larger.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units the second smallest in order of owner-occupied housing units of all the other places in the metro area at 276 of the total. Second, it has the second smallest in order of owner-occupied housing units of all the other places in the metro area when ranked by renter housing units at 15 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has one of the largest proportions of one unit detached at 99% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Stanchfield CDP with 100%. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by one unit detached of all the other places in the local area as measured by mobile home at 1% of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $307,100 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $220,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $189,600 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Rock Creek with $192,400. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $178,400 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Pine City with $204,300. In addition, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1940 to 1949 at $181,300 of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $177,800 of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Rushseba township residents. it has a homeowner household size of 2.5 which is the third most homeowner household size of all other places in the greater Rushseba township region. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Rock Creek which depicts a homeowner household size of 2.9 (17.7% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Rushseba township shows it has a renter household size of 2.1 which is the third most renter household sizes of all other places in the greater Rushseba township region. The city with the highest renter household size in the area is Rock Creek which shows a renter household sizes of 2.5 (22.7% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 12% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 39% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Rushseba township has the percentage of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 in the center range of other places in the local area at 19% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 55% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 1990 to 1999 at 13% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 1989 or earlier at 13% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Harris with 16%.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 2002 which is the smallest in terms of median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Rushseba township depicts it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2002 which is the second smallest when sorted by median year that a renter moved in of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the percentage of homes using natural gas the second smallest in order of homes using natural gas of all the other places in the metropolitan area at 17% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 54% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Rock Creek with 70%. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes using wood at 14% of the total and is ranked #1.