Carsonville township Minnesota Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Carsonville township Minnesota housing market data taken from the most recent 2021 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Carsonville township depicts it has a Housing Units of 115 which is the second smallest in terms of housing units of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Carsonville township housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Carsonville township indicates it has a Housing Density of 3.3 which is the smallest as measured by housing density of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest housing density in the area is Frazee which depicts a density of 625.3 ( very much bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.2, Carsonville township is approximately a twelfth the size. Also, compared to the state of Minnesota, housing density of 30.9, Carsonville township is approximately a tenth the size.

In Figure 4, Carsonville township area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Carsonville township shows it has a Housing Unit Change of -4.2% which is in the mid range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Pine Point CDP which indicates a housing units of 67.3% ( markedly bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 6.5%, Carsonville township is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of Minnesota, change in the housing units of 4.7%, Carsonville township is about the same size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Carsonville township depicts it has a Renter Percent of 8.4% which is the smallest as measured by renter percent of all the other places in the metropolitan area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 91.6% which is at the top of all other places in the greater region.

Carsonville township Minnesota Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Carsonville township home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Carsonville township depicts it has a Median Home Value of $251,000 which is the largest of all places in the greater Carsonville township region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Carsonville township Minnesota metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Carsonville township depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $833 which is the second most rental rates of all the places in the greater Carsonville township region. The city with the highest rental rates in the area is Osage CDP which depicts a rental rates of $910 (9.2% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,096, Carsonville township is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, in comparison with the state of Minnesota, rental rates of $1,010, Carsonville township is about 21.2% smaller.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Carsonville township has the smallest proportion of home price worth less than $50,000 at 6% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 22% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 38% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Elbow Lake CDP with 41%.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Carsonville township depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $742 which is in the intermediate range of other places in the area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Carsonville township metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 16% which is the second smallest in order of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the local area.

The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Carsonville township shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 427% which is the third most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all other places in the greater Carsonville township region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Carsonville township depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,450 which is the largest of all places in the greater Carsonville township region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $538 which is the most of all places in the greater Carsonville township region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Carsonville township has the percentage of owner cost less than $300 the second smallest when sorted by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the surrounding region at 11% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 24% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has in the middle range of other places in the greater region as measured by owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 13% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 17% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 1% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Carsonville township depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 23% which is in the mid range of other places in the greater region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Elbow Lake CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 51% (about twice as large). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Carsonville township shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 9% which is the smallest in order of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the surrounding region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Frazee which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 17% (about twice as large).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Carsonville township has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 88% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Carsonville township has the smallest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 16% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $300 and $500 at 22% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 16% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 2% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $1,750 which is the third most of all other places in the greater region. The city with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Osage CDP which shows a taxes paid of $1,893 (8.2% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,551, Carsonville township is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Minnesota, median real estate taxes paid of $2,606, Carsonville township is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Carsonville township Minnesota has the percentage of rent less than 300 dollars in the middle range of other places in the metropolitan area at 12% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent between 500 and 750 dollars at 88% of the total and is ranked #1.

Carsonville township Minnesota Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Carsonville township has one of the largest proportions of With mortgage at 47% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Park Rapids (49%), and #1 Menahga (61%) are larger. Second, it has in the middle range of other places in the metropolitan area as measured by With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 49% of the total.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Carsonville township has the percentage of houses with mortgages in the center range of other places in the surrounding region at 49% of the total.

Carsonville township Minnesota Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.1 which is less than most other places in the metro area. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Pine Point CDP which shows a family members per housing unit of 4.8 (54.0% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Carsonville township is about 6.7% smaller. Also, measured against the state of Minnesota, family members per housing unit of 3.2, Carsonville township is about the same size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 7.0 which is the largest of all places in the greater Carsonville township region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1983 which is the largest of all places in the greater Carsonville township region.

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of homes built in 2014 or later at 4% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 10% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 16% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Elbow Lake CDP with 17%. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 12% of the total. Furthermore, it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the local area as measured by homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 2% of the total. Next it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 15% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Frazee with 23%.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the smallest proportion of owner housing units at 8 of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2014 or later at $225,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $300,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $276,600 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Osage CDP ($321,400), and #1 Park Rapids ($714,300) are larger. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $143,800 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Park Rapids ($166,800), and #1 Osage CDP ($541,700) are larger. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 at $154,200 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Osage CDP with $212,500. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $225,000 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Park Rapids with $231,600. Next it has in the mid range of other places in the greater region as measured by value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $104,200 of the total.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the percentage of occupied housing units less than most other places in the local area at 17% of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Carsonville township residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 2.7 which is the second most homeowner household size of all the places in the greater Carsonville township region. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Pine Point CDP which shows a homeowner household size of 3.0 (10.8% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Carsonville township depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 1.5 which is the smallest in order of renter household size of all the other places in the area. The city with the highest renter household size in the area is Elbow Lake CDP which shows a renter household sizes of 5.4 (approximately 3.6 times bigger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2019 or later at 13% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Frazee (21%), and #1 Menahga (33%) are larger. Second, it has the second smallest in order of owners moved in 2019 or later of all the other places in the metro area in terms of owners moved in 2015 to 2018 at 11% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 52% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has less than most other places in the metropolitan area in order of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 10% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Carsonville township has the percentage of renters moved in 2019 or later the second smallest in terms of renters moved in 2019 or later of all the other places in the greater region at 8% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 42% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Elbow Lake CDP with 45%.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2003 which is less than most other places in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Carsonville township depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2020 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater Carsonville township region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of homes using natural gas at 37% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Elbow Lake CDP with 48%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 7% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of homes using coal or coke at 39% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has less than most other places in the greater region in order of homes using solar energy at 1% of the total.