Kingman UT Maine Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Kingman UT Maine housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Kingman UT shows it has a housing units of 112 which is the smallest when sorted by housing units of all the other places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Kingman UT housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Kingman UT depicts it has a housing density of 4.5 which is the smallest as measured by housing density of all the other places in the surrounding region. The city with the highest housing density in the area is East Millinocket CDP which depicts a density of 875.2 ( considerably bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Kingman UT is approximately a tenth the size. Also, in comparison with the state of Maine, housing density of 24.0, Kingman UT is approximately a fifth the size.

In Figure 4, Kingman UT area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Kingman UT shows it has a change in the housing units of -4.3% which is the second smallest in terms of change in the housing units of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Houlton CDP which depicts a housing units of 12.7% (approximately 3.0 times bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Kingman UT is about the same size. Also, in comparison with the state of Maine, change in the housing units of 2.4%, Kingman UT is 78.9% larger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Kingman UT depicts it has a renter percent of 11.5% which is the smallest in order of renter percent of all the other places in the local area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 88.5% which is the most of all places in the area.

Kingman UT Maine Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Kingman UT home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Kingman UT shows it has a median home price of $67,500 which is in the mid range of other places in the metro area. The city with the highest median home price in the area is Houlton CDP which shows a home price of $88,300 (30.8% larger).

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Kingman UT has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 the second smallest when ranked by home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the area at 13% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 81% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 6% of the total.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Kingman UT depicts it has a median ownership cost of $214 which is the smallest in order of median ownership cost of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Kingman UT metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 14% which is less than most other places in the surrounding region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Kingman UT shows it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 230% which is the third most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all other places in the greater Kingman UT region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $203 which is the smallest when ranked by median housing cost of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Kingman UT has the largest proportion of owner cost less than $300 at 72% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has less than most other places in the local area when ranked by owner cost between $300 and $500 at 22% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 4% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 4% of the total. In addition, it has less than most other places in the metro area in terms of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 9% of the total.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Kingman UT shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 19% which is in the center range of other places in the local area. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Milo CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 29% (52.4% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Kingman UT depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 9% which is the smallest as measured by cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the greater region. The city with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Milo CDP which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 15% (66.7% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Kingman UT has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 71% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Kingman UT has the largest proportion of housing cost less than $300 at 64% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $300 and $500 at 18% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 3% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 3% of the total.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $350 which is the smallest in order of median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the metro area. The city with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Millinocket CDP which indicates a taxes paid of $1,632 (approximately 4.7 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Kingman UT is approximately a sixth the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Maine, median real estate taxes paid of $2,515, Kingman UT is approximately an eigth the size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Kingman UT Maine. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Kingman UT has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Kingman UT Maine has the largest proportion of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 71% of the total and is ranked #1.

Kingman UT Maine Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Kingman UT has the percentage of with mortgage the second smallest as measured by with mortgage of all the other places in the local area at 39% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of no mortgage at 61% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Howland CDP with 68%.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Kingman UT has the percentage of houses with mortgages the second smallest in order of houses with a mortgage of all the other places in the metro area at 39% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of houses without mortgages at 61% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Howland CDP with 68%.

Kingman UT Maine Home Characteristics Charts

The next section of charts provide a wide range of metrics related to the housing market physical characteristics which can be useful for a real estate investor. Figure 27 looks at the number of people living in a typical house in the real estate market starting with the average household size (families and non families). Kingman UT has the smallest proportion of housing density at 1.5 of the total. Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 2.3 which is the smallest when sorted by family members per housing unit of all the other places in the greater region. The city with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Howland CDP which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.3 (42.7% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Kingman UT is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, compared to the state of Maine, family members per housing unit of 3.0, Kingman UT is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 4.6 which is the smallest when sorted by average number of rooms in a house of all the other places in the metro area. The city with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is East Millinocket CDP which shows an average number of rooms in a house of 5.8 (26.1% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1976 which is the most of all places in the greater Kingman UT region.

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 26% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 16% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 3% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 2% of the total. In addition, it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the local area when sorted by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 4% of the total. Furthermore, it has less than most other places in the local area as measured by homes built between 1939 or earlier at 28% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the smallest proportion of owner housing units at 54 of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of renter housing units at 7 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of mobile home at 35% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 1939 or earlier less than most other places in the metropolitan area at $54,700 of the total.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the smallest proportion of occupied housing units at 54% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of vacant housing units at 46% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Kingman UT residents. it has a homeowner household size of 1.5 which is the smallest in order of homeowner household size of all the other places in the local area. The city with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Milo CDP which shows a homeowner household size of 2.5 (64.3% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 4% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the surrounding region in order of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 14% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 20% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger city being Milo CDP with 25%. Also, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 1989 or earlier at 61% of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Kingman UT has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 1989 which is the smallest in terms of median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the local area.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of homes using wood at 30% of the total and is ranked #1.