Temple Hill CCD Kentucky Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Temple Hill CCD Kentucky housing market data taken from the most recent 2019 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Temple Hill CCD shows it has a housing units of 1,405 which is the second most of all the places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Temple Hill CCD housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Temple Hill CCD shows it has a housing density of 19.8 which is the smallest as measured by housing density of all the other places in the area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Glasgow which shows a density of 431.9 ( markedly bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.6, Temple Hill CCD is approximately half the size. Also, measured against the state of Kentucky, housing density of 50.1, Temple Hill CCD is approximately half the size.

In Figure 4, Temple Hill CCD area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Temple Hill CCD shows it has a change in the housing units of -2.4% which is less than most other places in the greater region. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Hiseville CDP which depicts a housing units of 23.6% ( considerably bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 4.9%, Temple Hill CCD is about the same size. Also, in contrast to the state of Kentucky, change in the housing units of 2.5%, Temple Hill CCD is about the same size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Temple Hill CCD shows it has a renter percent of 14.7% which is the smallest when ranked by renter percent of all the other places in the local area. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has an owner percent of 85.3% which is the most of all places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region.

Temple Hill CCD Kentucky Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Temple Hill CCD home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Temple Hill CCD shows it has a median home price of $113,400 which is the highest of all places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Temple Hill CCD Kentucky metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Temple Hill CCD depicts it has a rental rates of $685 which is the second most rental rates of all the places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Glasgow which indicates a rental rates of $703 (only about 2.6% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,023, Temple Hill CCD is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, measured against the state of Kentucky, rental rates of $741, Temple Hill CCD is about 8.2% smaller.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Temple Hill CCD has the percentage of home price worth less than $50,000 in the mid point range of other places in the greater region at 19% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 25% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 18% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Temple Hill CCD depicts it has a median ownership cost of $671 which is at the top of all other places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Temple Hill CCD metro area. it has a cost as a percent of household income of 17% which is in the mid range of other places in the local area. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Temple Hill CCD depicts it has a median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of 333% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Temple Hill CCD depicts it has a median housing cost of $916 which is the third most of all other places in the surrounding region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a median housing cost of $315 which is in the mid range of other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Temple Hill CCD has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 24% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Temple Hill CCD depicts it has a cost as a percent of household income of 22% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Summer Shade CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 45% (about twice as large). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Temple Hill CCD shows it has a cost as a percent of household income of 9% which is the second smallest in terms of cost as a percent of household income of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Fountain Run which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 16% (about twice as large).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Temple Hill CCD has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 32% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Summer Shade CDP with 56%. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 20% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Glasgow with 27%. Third, it has in the mid point range of other places in the surrounding region in order of rent as a percent of income is over 50pct at 17% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Temple Hill CCD has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 2% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a median real estate taxes paid of $658 which is the second most median real estate taxes paid of all the places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Glasgow which shows a taxes paid of $975 (48.2% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,375, Temple Hill CCD is approximately a third the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Kentucky, median real estate taxes paid of $1,166, Temple Hill CCD is approximately half the size.

Figure 22 shows the percentage of renters who pay for utilities in Temple Hill CCD Kentucky. This is calculated as the percent of renters who pay separately for utilities versus the people who have utilities included as part of amenities. Temple Hill CCD has the largest proportion of pay extra for utilities at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Temple Hill CCD Kentucky has the percentage of rent between 300 and 500 dollars less than most other places in the local area at 8% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 19% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Glasgow with 29%. Third, it has the largest proportion of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 11% of the total and is ranked #1.

Temple Hill CCD Kentucky Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Temple Hill CCD has the percentage of no mortgage in the mid point range of other places in the greater region at 46% of the total.

Temple Hill CCD Kentucky Home Characteristics Charts

The next section of charts provide a wide range of metrics related to the housing market physical characteristics which can be useful for a real estate investor. Figure 27 looks at the number of people living in a typical house in the real estate market starting with the average household size (families and non families). Temple Hill CCD has the largest proportion of housing density at 3.0 of the total and is ranked #1. Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a family members per housing unit of 3.5 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Temple Hill CCD is only about 4.5% larger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Kentucky, family members per housing unit of 3.1, Temple Hill CCD is 10.7% larger.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has an average number of rooms in a house of 5.8 which is the largest of all places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a year built of 1976 which is the second most year built of all the places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Edmonton which depicts a year built of 1978 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 17% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hiseville CDP with 24%. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 18% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Edmonton with 22%. Third, it has less than most other places in the metro area when ranked by homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 18% of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 5% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Fountain Run (7%), and #1 Glasgow (9%) are larger. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1939 or earlier at 17% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Hiseville CDP (21%), and #1 Summer Shade CDP (34%) are larger.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has one of the largest proportions of owner housing units at 1,035 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Glasgow with 2,867. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the local area when sorted by renter housing units at 179 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. has the percentage of 3 or 4 units in the mid range of other places in the surrounding region at 1% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of mobile home at 20% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fountain Run with 27%.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $87,000 of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $78,000 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Tompkinsville ($78,100), and #1 Glasgow ($137,100) are larger. Third, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $161,500 of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $87,800 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Edmonton with $88,700. In addition, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $88,900 of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1939 or earlier at $112,500 of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Temple Hill CCD residents. it has a homeowner household size of 3.0 which is at the top of all other places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region.

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Temple Hill CCD depicts it has a renter household size of 3.4 which is the most of all places in the greater Temple Hill CCD region. Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2017 or later in the mid range of other places in the surrounding region at 1% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 23% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Summer Shade CDP with 44%. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 35% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fountain Run with 52%. Also, it has the second smallest as measured by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area as measured by owners moved in 1989 or earlier at 17% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Temple Hill CCD has the percentage of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 the second smallest when ranked by renters moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the surrounding region at 6% of the total. Second, it has less than most other places in the greater region as measured by renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 27% of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 37% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Summer Shade CDP with 42%. Also, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 1990 to 1999 at 26% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 1989 or earlier at 4% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a median year that a home owner moved in of 1999 which is in the center range of other places in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Temple Hill CCD shows it has a median year that a renter moved in of 2009 which is less than most other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the smallest proportion of homes using natural gas at 13% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 21% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fountain Run with 24%. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of homes using wood at 10% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Summer Shade CDP with 15%.