Francisville CDP Kentucky Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Francisville CDP Kentucky housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Francisville CDP shows it has a Housing Units of 3,444 which is the second most of all the places in the local area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Francisville CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Francisville CDP shows it has a Housing Density of 406.0 which is in the center range of other places in the greater region. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Cleves which shows a density of 726.4 (78.9% larger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, Francisville CDP is substantially bigger. Also, in contrast to the state of Kentucky, housing density of 50.5, Francisville CDP is very much bigger.

In Figure 4, Francisville CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Francisville CDP depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of 29.4% which is the largest of all places in the greater Francisville CDP region. Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, Francisville CDP is approximately 4.0 times bigger. Also, compared to the state of Kentucky, change in the housing units of 3.2%, Francisville CDP is considerably bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Francisville CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 8.3% which is the second smallest in terms of renter percent of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 91.7% which is the second most owner percent of all the places in the greater Francisville CDP region.

Francisville CDP Kentucky Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Francisville CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Francisville CDP shows it has a Median Home Value of $317,000 which is the most of all places in the greater Francisville CDP region. Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Francisville CDP Kentucky metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Francisville CDP depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $1,288 which is the second most of all the places in the greater region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Mack CDP which depicts a rental rates of $1,330 (only about 3.3% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,163, Francisville CDP is 10.7% larger. Also, benchmarked against the state of Kentucky, rental rates of $826, Francisville CDP is 55.9% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Francisville CDP has the smallest proportion of home price worth less than $50,000 at 0% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest in order of home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the area when ranked by home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 14% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $200,000 to $300,000 at 35% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Francisville CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $1,718 which is the largest of all places in the greater Francisville CDP region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Francisville CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 14% which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Francisville CDP shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 435% which is the second most median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the places in the greater Francisville CDP region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Francisville CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,970 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Francisville CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $699 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Francisville CDP region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Francisville CDP has the percentage of owner cost less than $300 less than most other places in the greater region at 4% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 5% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $500 and $700 at 8% of the total. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 20% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Mack CDP with 24%. In addition, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $3,500 and $4,000 at 4% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being North Bend with 7%.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Francisville CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 15% which is less than most other places in the greater region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Cleves which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 19% (28.7% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Francisville CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 9% which is in the middle range of other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Addyston which indicates a cost as a percent of household income of 14% (52.2% larger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Francisville CDP has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct in the middle range of other places in the greater region at 37% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 48% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest in order of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the metro area when sorted by rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 6% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Francisville CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $300 and $500 at 4% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 9% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $1,500 and $2,000 at 21% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 10% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $2,840 which is the third most of all other places in the greater region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is North Bend which shows a taxes paid of $4,903 (72.6% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,690, Francisville CDP is only about 5.6% larger. Also, compared to the state of Kentucky, median real estate taxes paid of $1,320, Francisville CDP is about twice as large.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Francisville CDP Kentucky has the largest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 58% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 23% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 North Bend (23%), and #1 Mack CDP (29%) are larger.

Francisville CDP Kentucky Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Francisville CDP has one of the largest proportions of With mortgage at 65% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Cleves (67%), and #1 Hebron CDP (68%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of No 2nd Mortgage or HELOC at 14% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 14%. Third, it has the largest proportion of With Multiple Mortgages at 1% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of Primary Mortgage with 2nd Mortgage and HELOC at 12% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Hebron CDP with 13%. In addition, it has the second smallest in terms of With Mortgage of all the other places in the surrounding region in order of With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 20% of the total.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Francisville CDP has the percentage of houses with mortgages the second smallest in terms of houses with a mortgage of all the other places in the local area at 20% of the total.

Francisville CDP Kentucky Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.3 which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Hebron CDP which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.8 (14.9% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Francisville CDP is about the same size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Kentucky, family members per housing unit of 3.2, Francisville CDP is only about 3.4% larger.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 8.0 which is the highest of all places in the greater region. Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 2003 which is the most of all places in the metro area.

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has the largest proportion of homes built in 2020 or later at 12% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2019 at 56% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest in terms of homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the metropolitan area when sorted by homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 1% of the total. Also, it has the second smallest in order of homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the local area as measured by homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 3% of the total. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 1% of the total. Furthermore, it has the second smallest when sorted by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the metro area as measured by homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 1% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. it has the largest proportion of owner housing units at 275 of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2014 or later at $344,400 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Mack CDP ($470,900), and #1 North Bend ($512,500) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 at $317,700 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Cleves ($333,100), and #1 North Bend ($376,000) are larger. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 2000 to 2009 at $325,900 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Mack CDP with $351,500. Also, it has the largest proportion of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 at $418,900 of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $115,400 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Mack CDP with $203,600.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Francisville CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 3.1 which is in the center range of other places in the local area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Shawnee CDP which depicts a homeowner household size of 3.4 (10.7% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Francisville CDP depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.3 which is the second smallest when ranked by renter household size of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Addyston which shows a renter household sizes of 3.6 (54.5% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2019 or later at 24% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Addyston with 31%. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2015 to 2018 at 26% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Mack CDP with 26%. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 2% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Francisville CDP has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2019 or later at 65% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 North Bend (66%), and #1 Shawnee CDP (100%) are larger. Second, it has less than most other places in the local area when sorted by renters moved in 2015 to 2018 at 5% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2011 which is ranked #1 of all places in the metropolitan area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Francisville CDP indicates it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2018 which is ranked #1 of all places in the greater region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the percentage of homes using coal or coke in the intermediate range of other places in the metro area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes using solar energy at 0% of the total and is ranked #1.