Tice CDP Florida Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Tice CDP Florida housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Tice CDP depicts it has a Housing Units of 1,707 which is the second smallest when ranked by housing units of all the other places in the greater region.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Tice CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Tice CDP shows it has a Housing Density of 1550.0 which is the most of all places in the local area. Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, Tice CDP is substantially bigger. Also, compared to the state of Florida, housing density of 181.9, Tice CDP is markedly bigger.

In Figure 4, Tice CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Tice CDP depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of 0.4% which is less than most other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Fort Myers which shows a housing units of 23.2% ( very much bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, Tice CDP is only about 5.6% the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Florida, change in the housing units of 8.6%, Tice CDP is only about 4.8% the size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Tice CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 47.6% which is the third most renter percent of all other places in the greater Tice CDP region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 52.4% which is less than most other places in the greater region.

Tice CDP Florida Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Tice CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Tice CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value of $119,600 which is in the mid range of other places in the metro area. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Buckingham CDP which depicts a home price of $297,800 (approximately 2.5 times bigger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Tice CDP Florida metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Tice CDP depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $1,075 which is in the middle range of other places in the area. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Buckingham CDP which depicts a rental rates of $1,643 (52.8% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,163, Tice CDP is about 8.2% smaller. Also, compared with the state of Florida, rental rates of $1,301, Tice CDP is about 21.0% smaller.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Tice CDP has one of the largest proportions of home price worth less than $50,000 at 25% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Suncoast Estates CDP (45%), and #1 Palmona Park CDP (46%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 49% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fort Myers Shores CDP with 52%. Third, it has less than most other places in the metro area when sorted by home price worth between $100,000 to $200,000 at 4% of the total.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Tice CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Cost of $619 which is less than most other places in the area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Tice CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 16% which is less than most other places in the metro area.

The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Tice CDP shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 352% which is in the middle range of other places in the metro area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Tice CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $1,176 which is less than most other places in the greater region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $282 which is less than most other places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Tice CDP has the largest proportion of owner cost less than $300 at 34% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area when ranked by owner cost between $300 and $500 at 4% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 29% of the total and is ranked #1.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Tice CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 29% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Tice CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Suncoast Estates CDP which depicts a cost as a percent of household income of 51% (74.1% larger). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Tice CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 9% which is less than most other places in the area. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Palmona Park CDP which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 51% ( substantially bigger).

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Tice CDP has the percentage of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct less than most other places in the surrounding region at 16% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 33% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has less than most other places in the local area in order of rent as a percent of income is between 30pct to 40pct at 5% of the total. Also, it has less than most other places in the metro area in order of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 21% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Tice CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $300 and $500 at 3% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $700 and $1,000 at 40% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $764 which is the second smallest when ranked by median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Fort Myers which indicates a taxes paid of $3,164 (approximately 4.1 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,690, Tice CDP is approximately a third the size. Also, measured against the state of Florida, median real estate taxes paid of $2,143, Tice CDP is approximately a third the size.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Tice CDP Florida has the percentage of rent between 500 and 750 dollars less than most other places in the metro area at 22% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 51% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fort Myers Shores CDP with 56%. Third, it has less than most other places in the greater region in order of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 4% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of rent between $2,500 and $3,500 at 4% of the total and is ranked #1.

Tice CDP Florida Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Tice CDP has one of the largest proportions of With mortgage at 45% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Buckingham CDP (56%), and #1 Fort Myers Shores CDP (56%) are larger. Second, it has the largest proportion of Primary Mortgage and HELOC at 2% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has less than most other places in the surrounding region when sorted by With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 51% of the total.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Tice CDP has the percentage of houses with mortgages less than most other places in the local area at 51% of the total.

Tice CDP Florida Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 4.5 which is more than all other places in the greater Tice CDP region. Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Tice CDP is 35.1% larger. Also, in comparison with the state of Florida, family members per housing unit of 3.3, Tice CDP is 36.7% larger.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 4.8 which is the third most average number of rooms in a house of all other places in the greater Tice CDP region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Buckingham CDP which shows an average number of rooms in a house of 5.9 (22.9% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1965 which is the second smallest when ranked by year built of all the other places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest year built in the area is Fort Myers which depicts a year built of 1997 ( only slightly larger).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. has the percentage of homes built in 2020 or later less than most other places in the greater region at 3% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2019 at 2% of the total. Third, it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the greater region in terms of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 2% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 5% of the total. In addition, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 28% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 26% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Palmona Park CDP with 45%. Next it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 8% of the total and is ranked #1. Additionally, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 4% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units less than most other places in the area at 711 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of 2 units at 7% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the metro area in terms of 50 or more units at 9% of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 1980 to 1989 in the middle range of other places in the local area at $117,600 of the total. Second, it has in the mid range of other places in the metro area when sorted by value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $122,700 of the total. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $99,800 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 North Fort Myers CDP ($122,400), and #1 Fort Myers ($165,400) are larger. Also, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1950 to 1959 at $71,500 of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 North Fort Myers CDP ($129,200), and #1 Fort Myers ($241,300) are larger.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. has the smallest proportion of occupied housing units at 12% of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Tice CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 3.2 which is the second most homeowner household size of all the places in the greater Tice CDP region. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Palmona Park CDP which depicts a homeowner household size of 4.2 (31.5% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Tice CDP depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 3.7 which is at the top of all other places in the greater Tice CDP region. Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 2019 or later at 29% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Fort Myers with 34%. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by owners moved in 2019 or later of all the other places in the greater region as measured by owners moved in 2015 to 2018 at 8% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Tice CDP has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2019 or later at 63% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Fort Myers Shores CDP (71%), and #1 Palmona Park CDP (74%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 16% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Buckingham CDP with 18%. Third, it has in the center range of other places in the greater region in terms of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 1% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2005 which is the second smallest when ranked by median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the local area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Tice CDP indicates it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2016 which is the third most median year that a renter moved in of all other places in the greater Tice CDP region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of homes using wood at 0% of the total and is ranked #1.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Tice CDP housing department, Florida department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Tice CDP shows it has a Total In Group Quarters of 30 which is in the middle range of other places in the metropolitan area.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Tice CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Tice CDP has the largest proportion of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.