Mather CDP California Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of Mather CDP California housing market data taken from the most recent 2022 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. Mather CDP shows it has a Housing Units of 1,480 which is the smallest as measured by housing units of all the other places in the metro area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the Mather CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) Mather CDP depicts it has a Housing Density of 147.6 which is the smallest in terms of housing density of all the other places in the local area. The place with the highest housing density in the area is La Riviera CDP which shows a density of 2551.8 ( appreciably bigger). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 39.5, Mather CDP is approximately 3.7 times bigger. Also, compared with the state of California, housing density of 92.1, Mather CDP is 60.3% larger.

In Figure 4, Mather CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. Mather CDP depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of -2.6% which is the smallest when ranked by change in the housing units of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest change in the housing units in the area is Vineyard CDP which depicts a housing units of 61.1% ( considerably bigger). Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 7.4%, Mather CDP is about the same size. Also, measured against the state of California, change in the housing units of 4.7%, Mather CDP is about the same size.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) Mather CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 17.1% which is the second smallest in terms of renter percent of all the other places in the greater region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 82.9% which is the second most owner percent of all the places in the greater Mather CDP region.

Mather CDP California Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average Mather CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. Mather CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value of $434,400 which is the second most of all the places in the greater region. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Gold River CDP which shows a home price of $571,900 (31.7% larger). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the Mather CDP California metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. Mather CDP depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $1,910 which is the second most of all the places in the metro area. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Gold River CDP which shows a rental rates of $2,301 (20.5% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,163, Mather CDP is 64.2% larger. Also, measured against the state of California, rental rates of $1,698, Mather CDP is 12.5% larger.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. Mather CDP has the largest proportion of home price worth between $300,000 to $400,000 at 30% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Mather CDP shows it has a Median Owner Cost of $2,343 which is the highest of all places in the greater Mather CDP region. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the Mather CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 23% which is more than all other places in the greater Mather CDP region. The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. Mather CDP shows it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 570% which is the smallest when sorted by median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) Mather CDP depicts it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $2,534 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater Mather CDP region. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $729 which is the second most of all the places in the local area.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. Mather CDP has the percentage of owner cost less than $300 the second smallest in terms of owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of owner cost between $300 and $500 at 5% of the total. Third, it has the second smallest as measured by owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area as measured by owner cost between $500 and $700 at 6% of the total. Also, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 24% of the total and is ranked #1. In addition, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $2,500 and $3,000 at 9% of the total and is ranked #1. Furthermore, it has one of the largest proportions of owner cost between $3,000 and $3,500 at 8% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Gold River CDP with 9%.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) Mather CDP depicts it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 24% which is the second most cost as a percent of household income of all the places in the greater Mather CDP region. The place with the highest cost as a percent of household income in the area is Vineyard CDP which shows a cost as a percent of household income of 24% ( about the same size). Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. Mather CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 14% which is more than all other places in the greater Mather CDP region.

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) Mather CDP has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct at 14% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 46% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 20pct to 30pct at 9% of the total. Also, it has the second smallest as measured by rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct of all the other places in the metro area when ranked by rent as a percent of income is between 30pct to 40pct at 4% of the total. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 14% of the total.

Figure 20 shows the total housing cost for both home owners and apartment community renters in the area. Mather CDP has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $300 and $500 at 4% of the total. Second, it has the smallest proportion of housing cost between $500 and $700 at 5% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of housing cost between $2,000 and $2,500 at 23% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $3,818 which is the second most median real estate taxes paid of all the places in the greater Mather CDP region. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Gold River CDP which depicts a taxes paid of $4,885 (27.9% larger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,690, Mather CDP is 41.9% larger. Also, in contrast to the state of California, median real estate taxes paid of $4,279, Mather CDP is about 12.1% smaller.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. Mather CDP California has the percentage of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars the second smallest in order of rent less than 300 dollars of all the other places in the greater region at 12% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between 1000 and 1500 dollars at 60% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Gold River CDP with 65%. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of rent between $1,500 and $2,500 at 23% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Gold River CDP with 31%.

Mather CDP California Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. Mather CDP has the largest proportion of With mortgage at 78% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the smallest proportion of Primary Mortgage and HELOC at 0% of the total. Third, it has the smallest proportion of With HELOC no Primary Mortgage at 14% of the total.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. Mather CDP has the smallest proportion of houses with mortgages at 14% of the total.

Mather CDP California Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.7 which is the second most of all the places in the metropolitan area. The place with the highest family members per housing unit in the area is Vineyard CDP which shows a family members per housing unit of 3.8 (only about 4.4% larger). Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, Mather CDP is 10.6% larger. Also, compared with the state of California, family members per housing unit of 3.6, Mather CDP is about the same size.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 6.1 which is the second most average number of rooms in a house of all the places in the greater Mather CDP region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Gold River CDP which shows an average number of rooms in a house of 6.3 (only about 3.3% larger).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built in 2020 or later at 2% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Rancho Cordova (9%), and #1 Vineyard CDP (14%) are larger. Second, it has the largest proportion of homes built between 2010 to 2019 at 78% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has in the mid range of other places in the area in order of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 8% of the total. Also, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 7% of the total. In addition, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 2% of the total. Furthermore, it has the second smallest in terms of homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the area in terms of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 1% of the total. Next it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2020 or later of all the other places in the metropolitan area as measured by homes built between 1960 to 1969 at 1% of the total.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the smallest proportion of owner housing units at 247 of the total.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 2010 to 2013 less than most other places in the metro area at $427,200 of the total.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for Mather CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 3.4 which is the highest of all places in the greater Mather CDP region.

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. Mather CDP shows it has a Renter-Household Size of 2.4 which is less than most other places in the local area. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Vineyard CDP which depicts a renter household sizes of 3.8 (58.4% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2019 or later at 31% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 41% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 1% of the total. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. Mather CDP has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2019 or later at 57% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the second smallest as measured by renters moved in 2019 or later of all the other places in the greater region in order of renters moved in 2015 to 2018 at 21% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of renters moved in 2000 to 2009 at 4% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 2010 which is the second most median year that a home owner moved in of all the places in the greater Mather CDP region. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. Mather CDP shows it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2017 which is the second most median year that a renter moved in of all the places in the greater Mather CDP region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. has the smallest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 22% of the total.

The next two charts show the number of people living in group quarters and includes temporary as well permanent housing which may be run by the Mather CDP housing department, California department, or other housing authority or public housing agency. beginning with Figure 43 which shows the total number of people. Mather CDP indicates it has a Total In Group Quarters of 3 which is the second smallest in order of total people living in group quarters of all the other places in the surrounding region.

Figure 44 shows the percentage of people who are living in group quarters to the total population for Mather CDP residents (these may include colleges and jails but also community centers for homelessness or that require a housing choice voucher which are run by certain nonprofits or an affordable housing department.) Mather CDP has the largest proportion of number of people under 18 years of age and in group quarters at 100% of the total and is ranked #1.