McAlmont CDP Arkansas Area Home Supply Charts

This page looks at a variety of McAlmont CDP Arkansas housing market data taken from the most recent 2020 American Community Survey census data. Housing units are structures such as a single family home, apartment community, mobile home park, public housing, etc. where a person or family live and live separately from other residents of the building. Figure 1 shows the total number of housing units for each city. McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Housing Units of 1,023 which is less than most other places in the area.

Figure 2 illustrates the housing density in the McAlmont CDP housing market as measured by housing units per square land mile (includes single family homes, apartments, etc.) McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Housing Density of 642.9 which is the third most of all other places in the surrounding region. The place with the highest housing density in the area is Cammack Village which depicts a density of 1279.6 (about twice as large). Comparing housing density to the United States average of 38.9, McAlmont CDP is very much bigger. Also, compared to the state of Arkansas, housing density of 26.3, McAlmont CDP is very much bigger.

In Figure 4, McAlmont CDP area change in the number of housing units and is a forward gauge (along with population change) for any potential housing shortage. McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Housing Unit Change of 26.1% which is more than all other places in the greater McAlmont CDP region. Comparing change in the housing units to the United States average of 5.7%, McAlmont CDP is approximately 4.6 times bigger. Also, measured against the state of Arkansas, change in the housing units of 4.1%, McAlmont CDP is very much bigger.

Figure 5 shows the percentage of rental property based on that they are occupied by renters as a percent of the total number of households in the community (including homes, apartments, etc.) McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Renter Percent of 49.4% which is the third most renter percent of all other places in the greater McAlmont CDP region. Figure 6 illustrates the total number of housing units that are occupied by owners. it has a Owner Percent of 50.6% which is less than most other places in the greater region.

McAlmont CDP Arkansas Home Cost Charts

Looking at the housing data provided in Figure 7, the average McAlmont CDP home price is illustrated for this community and a useful analysis of affordable housing. McAlmont CDP shows it has a Median Home Value of $111,100 which is the second smallest in terms of median home price of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest median home price in the area is Cammack Village which shows a home price of $207,800 (about twice as large). Figure 8 provides aggregate comparative data for the McAlmont CDP Arkansas metro area in terms of the median housing rental rate, apartment rent, etc. McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Median Gross Rent of $744 which is the smallest when sorted by rental rates of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest rental rates in the area is Cammack Village which shows a rental rates of $1,152 (54.8% larger). Comparing rental rates to the United States average of $1,062, McAlmont CDP is approximately three-fourths the size. Also, benchmarked against the state of Arkansas, rental rates of $745, McAlmont CDP is about the same size.

Figure 9 provides the frequency distribution of home prices for the area and is useful for understanding affordable housing fund. McAlmont CDP has one of the largest proportions of home price worth less than $50,000 at 33% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being College Station CDP with 44%. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by home price worth less than $50,000 of all the other places in the local area in terms of home price worth between $50,000 to $100,000 at 33% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of home price worth between $400,000 to $500,000 at 3% of the total and is ranked #1.

Median owner costs for the real estate market are shown in Figure 10 and include the costs associated with any mortgage, utility expenses, insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. McAlmont CDP shows it has a Median Owner Cost of $489 which is the second smallest in order of median ownership cost of all the other places in the area. Figure 11 shows the median amount of cost as a percent of total household income for people who own homes in the McAlmont CDP metro area. it has a Owner Cost as % of HH Income of 37% which is the largest of all places in the greater McAlmont CDP region.

The next chart, Figure 12, provides a comparison chart of the median home cost as a percent of a median worker take home earnings and is thus a valuable measure of affordable housing. McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Median Home Value as Percent of Median Earnings of 313% which is the second smallest when ranked by median home value as a percent of median worker earnings of all the other places in the metro area.

Figure 14 depicts the median cost of housing for owners with also have a mortgages (versus those who do not have a mortgage because mortgage cost is included.) McAlmont CDP shows it has a Median Owner Costs-With Mortgage of $850 which is the second smallest as measured by median housing cost of all the other places in the local area. Figure 15 is a chart that shows the median housing costs for owners who do not have mortgages (and therefore the cost of home ownership does not include mortgage cost.) it has a Median Owner Costs-Without Mortgage of $412 which is the second most median housing cost of all the places in the greater McAlmont CDP region.

Figure 16 shows the distribution in total housing cost for owners of property (so not renters.) This cost includes mortgages, lines of credit interest, utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. McAlmont CDP has one of the largest proportions of owner cost less than $300 at 25% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Cammack Village (26%), and #1 Gibson CDP (29%) are larger. Second, it has the largest proportion of owner cost between $700 and $1,000 at 31% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the second smallest in terms of owner cost less than $300 of all the other places in the local area in order of owner cost between $1,000 and $1,500 at 1% of the total.

Next shown in Figure 17 is the housing cost as a percent of household income for people who own their homes and have a mortgages (thus the cost of financing the home is included.) McAlmont CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-With Mortgage of 34% which is is the uppermost of the places in the greater McAlmont CDP region. Housing cost as a percent of household income for owners who do not have a mortgage is shown in Figure 18. This analysis can be useful for understanding the affordable housing for home ownership excluding any financing cost in the area shown. McAlmont CDP shows it has a % of Income Owner Costs-No Mortgage of 38% which is more than all other places in the greater McAlmont CDP region.

Figure 19 looks at the cost of rent for rental property using the percent of total household income which is a valuable measure of financial health for the area. (The higher the proportion of rent payments to total household income is a sign of greater financial stress. Also, rent can be covered by rent assistance and rent assistance programs in the form of rent assistance.) McAlmont CDP has the smallest proportion of rent as a percent of income is less than 10 pct at 11% of the total. Second, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 10pct to 20pct at 51% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of rent as a percent of income is between 40pct to 50pct at 30% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 21 shows median amount of real estate taxes paid for home owners in the region. it has a Median Real Estate Taxes Paid of $563 which is the second smallest when ranked by median real estate taxes paid of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest median real estate taxes paid in the area is Cammack Village which depicts a taxes paid of $1,831 (approximately 3.3 times bigger). Comparing median real estate taxes paid to the United States average of $2,471, McAlmont CDP is approximately a quarter the size. Also, compared with the state of Arkansas, median real estate taxes paid of $798, McAlmont CDP is approximately three-fourths the size.

Figure 23 shows the rental rate distribution for this area. McAlmont CDP Arkansas has one of the largest proportions of rent between 300 and 500 dollars at 31% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Jacksonville with 32%. Second, it has the smallest proportion of rent between 750 and 1000 dollars at 18% of the total.

McAlmont CDP Arkansas Home Financing Charts

The analysis in Figure 25 shows the detailed distribution of owned homes by mortgage status. McAlmont CDP has the percentage of both 2nd mortgage and heloc the second smallest when sorted by with mortgage of all the other places in the greater region at 28% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of no 2nd mortgage and no heloc at 72% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being College Station CDP with 100%.

Figure 26 shows the proportion of houses with a mortgage versus those without a mortgage. McAlmont CDP has one of the largest proportions of houses with mortgages at 72% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being College Station CDP with 100%.

McAlmont CDP Arkansas Home Characteristics Charts

Figure 28 shows the household size for families living in the area and it has a Family size of 3.8 which is the highest of all places in the greater McAlmont CDP region. Comparing family members per housing unit to the United States average of 3.3, McAlmont CDP is 15.6% larger. Also, measured against the state of Arkansas, family members per housing unit of 3.2, McAlmont CDP is 20.9% larger.

Figure 29 show the median number of rooms in a typical home for each location in this area. it has a Median Number of Rooms of 5.4 which is the second smallest as measured by average number of rooms in a house of all the other places in the greater region. The place with the highest average number of rooms in a house in the area is Gibson CDP which depicts an average number of rooms in a house of 6.0 (11.1% larger). Figure 30 shows, for the average house in each location, the median year that a house was built. This can be useful for understanding the relative age of one neighborhood versus another for a real estate investor. it has a Median Year Built of 1980 which is the third most year built of all other places in the greater McAlmont CDP region. The place with the highest year built in the area is Sherwood which depicts a year built of 1986 ( about the same size).

Figure 31 looks at the distribution of housing units by the median age that the homes were built. it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2010 to 2013 at 13% of the total and is ranked #3. Only #2 Gibson CDP (19%), and #1 Sherwood (19%) are larger. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 2000 to 2009 at 17% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being College Station CDP with 22%. Third, it has less than most other places in the metro area as measured by homes built between 1990 to 1999 at 9% of the total. Also, it has the second smallest when ranked by homes built in 2014 or later of all the other places in the local area in order of homes built between 1980 to 1989 at 12% of the total. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of homes built between 1970 to 1979 at 20% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being North Little Rock with 20%. Furthermore, it has the smallest proportion of homes built between 1950 to 1959 at 0% of the total. Next it has the largest proportion of homes built between 1940 to 1949 at 6% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 32 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners versus occupied by renters. has the percentage of owner housing units less than most other places in the metropolitan area at 346 of the total.

Figure 33 shows the difference in the number of housing units based on whether they are occupied by owners or renters. it has the largest proportion of 3 or 4 units at 10% of the total and is ranked #1. Second, it has the largest proportion of 5 to 9 units at 14% of the total and is ranked #1. Third, it has the largest proportion of 50 or more units at 12% of the total and is ranked #1.

Figure 34 shows the median value of homes broken down by the median year that the homes were built. has the percentage of value of homes built 1990 to 1999 less than most other places in the metro area at $88,900 of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1970 to 1979 at $221,100 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Cammack Village with $297,500. Third, it has one of the largest proportions of value of homes built 1960 to 1969 at $128,300 of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Cammack Village with $248,800.

Figure 35 compares the total number of occupied housing units to vacant housing units. This analysis can be used to understand any housing shortage in the community. it has one of the largest proportions of occupied housing units at 32% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being College Station CDP with 39%.

The next two charts show both the average household size of homeowners versus the average household size of renters. Starting with Figure 36 we see the household size of homeowners for McAlmont CDP residents. it has a Owner-Household Size of 1.7 which is the smallest when ranked by homeowner household size of all the other places in the metro area. The place with the highest homeowner household size in the area is Gibson CDP which shows a homeowner household size of 2.7 (56.5% larger).

Figure 37 shows the household size for renters. McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Renter-Household Size of 3.7 which is the second most renter household sizes of all the places in the greater McAlmont CDP region. The place with the highest renter household size in the area is Gibson CDP which indicates a renter household sizes of 4.2 (13.1% larger). Figure 38 shows the year that people who own homes moved into this region. has the percentage of owners moved in 2017 or later the second smallest in order of owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area at 1% of the total. Second, it has the second smallest when sorted by owners moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the area as measured by owners moved in 2015 to 2016 at 5% of the total. Third, it has the largest proportion of owners moved in 2010 to 2014 at 47% of the total and is ranked #1. Also, it has the smallest proportion of owners moved in 2000 to 2009 at 8% of the total. In addition, it has one of the largest proportions of owners moved in 1990 to 1999 at 38% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being College Station CDP with 66%. Figure 39 shows the year that people who rent moved into the area. McAlmont CDP has the percentage of renters moved in 2017 or later in the middle range of other places in the local area at 35% of the total. Second, it has one of the largest proportions of renters moved in 2015 to 2016 at 41% of the total and is ranked #2. The only larger place being Jacksonville with 43%. Third, it has the second smallest in terms of renters moved in 2017 or later of all the other places in the local area when sorted by renters moved in 2010 to 2014 at 1% of the total.

Figure 40 compares the median year that home owners moved into their home. it has a Owner Median Year Moved In of 1989 which is the second smallest in terms of median year that a home owner moved in of all the other places in the area. Figure 41 compares the median year that renters moved into their home. McAlmont CDP depicts it has a Renter Median Year Moved In of 2015 which is the third most median year that a renter moved in of all other places in the greater McAlmont CDP region.

Figure 42 shows the frequency distribution of various types of energy sources used for homes in the community. it has the largest proportion of home using bottled, tank, or lp gas at 62% of the total and is ranked #1.